On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:56:51 +0100
Vincent <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Lionel Le Folgoc <email@example.com>wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I've just seeded simple-scan to replace xsane. From what I could see, it
> > seems to be much more user-friendly, and to work fine. Ubuntu already
> > installs it by default (it's in main, whereas xsane has been demoted to
> > universe in lucid, which means a very limited supportâ€¦).
> > Of course, this can be reverted; I've only set it by default to gather
> > more feedback from more people (our fearless charlie-tca doesn't have a
> > scanner to test it :P), so feel free to react, and of course please
> > report bugs against 'simple-scan' when you experience some issues.
> > If it creates too much trouble I'll put back xsane.
> > Thanks!
> > Cheers,
> > Lionel
> I don't have a scanner, but I have used Xsane in the past, and this can't
> really be worse in use, so it sounds good to me ;-)
Now there is a confidence builder, huh?
Linux Registered User Number 425914 [http://counter.li.org/]
Never let anyone steal your DREAM. [http://keepingdreams.com]
xubuntu-devel mailing list