i understand that 10.04.4 has recently come out replacing 10.04.03 and on most of the offical ubuntu download pages it still links to the old one but that gives you a 404 error. Where should i file this bug, i have seen it in multiple places on the ubuntu website (i suppose they all point to the same place on the server though)


i was thinking and why don't they just make all of the links to downloads that will be update (LTS) in to symbolic links on the server and just change where the symbolic link would point. this would fix the problem of having to replace every place that refernces the outdated link right? please correct me if i'm wrong or have no idea what i am talking about (most propable)


thanks, Sam
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:07, Sam Sebastian <sebastiansam55@gmail.com> wrote:
> i understand that 10.04.4 has recently come out replacing 10.04.03 and on
> most of the offical ubuntu download pages it still links to the old one but
> that gives you a 404 error. Where should i file this bug, i have seen it in
> multiple places on the ubuntu website (i suppose they all point to the same
> place on the server though)

You could get on #ubuntu-release on FreeNode IRC (I think that's it)
and mention it there. Otherwise:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-website

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

On 21 February 2012 15:07, Sam Sebastian <sebastiansam55@gmail.com> wrote:
> i understand that 10.04.4 has recently come out replacing 10.04.03 and on
> most of the offical ubuntu download pages it still links to the old one but
> that gives you a 404 error. Where should i file this bug, i have seen it in
> multiple places on the ubuntu website (i suppose they all point to the same
> place on the server though)
>
> i was thinking and why don't they just make all of the links to downloads
> that will be update (LTS) in to symbolic links on the server and just change
> where the symbolic link would point. this would fix the problem of having to
> replace every place that refernces the outdated link right? please correct
> me if i'm wrong or have no idea what i am talking about (most propable)
>
> thanks, Sam
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

The best place I've always been pointed at to file bugs against
information on the official Ubuntu website is
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content They are generally very
responsive and quick to apply patches when you can be specific about
what the issues are.

--
Regards,

Jared Norris JP(Qual) BBehSc(Psych)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JaredNorris

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:09, Jared Norris <jrnorris@gmail.com> wrote:
> The best place I've always been pointed at to file bugs against
> information on the official Ubuntu website is
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content They are generally very
> responsive and quick to apply patches when you can be specific about
> what the issues are.

Yeah, that may be better than the generic website link I posted... good call.

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users