On 09/27/2011 12:41 AM, Fred A. Miller wrote:
On 09/27/2011 12:29 AM, Ric Moore wrote:
On 09/26/2011 07:29 PM, Avi Greenbury wrote:
The bigger flaw is that you're assuming the user is in a position to
make that judgement as to whether to allow the code to run, and in a
position where they actually care. Neither of these are generally true,
as we can see with attitudes towards current, conventional, malware.
Maybe Microsoft just wants to catch up to Apple, with regards to
controlling the masses and their hardware. That would fit, according
to my usual paranoia.
In the end what will be telling is what outfits like Tiger will offer
according to what is purchased. If the market is great enough for
non-UEFI bios design motherboards, then they will be offered for sale. Ric
'Better still be over-clockable.
This new ASUS board of mine claims to be in "auto-overclock" mode. I
have no clue what that is supposed to mean or do. Ric
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
ubuntu-users mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users