Hello,

See:
http://wiki.kartbuilding.net/index.php/Postfix_SMTP#Blocking_Spam_with_spamhaus_and_Postf ix



Cheers.

Cassius V. de Magalhaes escreveu:

* PGP Signed: 11/13/09 at 22:13:10

Hello,

I think the most e-mail server's administrators avoid UCEPROTECT
because this annoying, try SPAMHAUS instead.



Cheers.

Karl F. Larsen escreveu:

Wade Smart wrote:


Florian Diesch wrote:


"Amedee Van Gasse (ub)" <amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be> writes:



Nov 12 15:11:24 localhost postfix/smtpd[7919]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from

chlorine.canonical.com[91.189.94.204]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [91.189.94.204] blocked using dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net; IP
91.189.94.204 is UCEPROTECT-Level 1 listed. See
http://www.uceprotect.net/rblcheck.php?ipr=91.189.94.204;
from=<sounder-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com> to=<amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be>
proto=ESMTP helo=<chlorine.canonical.com>
Nov 12 15:12:04 localhost postfix/smtpd[7919]: disconnect from
chlorine.canonical.com[91.189.94.204]



My conclusion: Canonical is blacklisted by http://www.uceprotect.net.

According to
<http://www.uceprotect.net/rblcheck.php?ipr=91.189.94.204>

it's not blacklisted now (at 2009-11-13 15:27:06+01:00)



Should I file a bug somewhere in Launchpad? Because this problem
is not

software related. I don't know what the proper procedure is.


I'd write to postmaster@canonical.com for this kind of problem



Florian

About a year after I joined this list the same thing happened to me.
I contacted my mail host, then their upstream host and finally their
upstream broadband provider. It was crazy nonsense. I had to use an
alternate email just to access the list - and I have ever sense.


A few times I forget to change addresses and the email will come
through - but the few times I have tried to go back to my original
address, I get bounced messages in a few days.


Wade


I think a spam filter might get active on the words used on this
list and kick a message out as spam and bounce the message back. It
happens very seldom but it happens.


73 Karl






* Cassius Vinicius de Magalhaes <cassius@cassius.vinicius.nom.br>
* 0xBF5DD116
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> On 11/13/2009 06:33 AM, Florian Diesch wrote:
>> "Amedee Van Gasse (ub)" <amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Nov 12 15:11:24 localhost postfix/smtpd[7919]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>>> chlorine.canonical.com[91.189.94.204]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
>>> Client host [91.189.94.204] blocked using dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net; IP
>>> 91.189.94.204 is UCEPROTECT-Level 1 listed. See
>>> http://www.uceprotect.net/rblcheck.php?ipr=91.189.94.204;
>>> from=<sounder-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com> to=<amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be>
>>> proto=ESMTP helo=<chlorine.canonical.com>
>>> Nov 12 15:12:04 localhost postfix/smtpd[7919]: disconnect from
>>> chlorine.canonical.com[91.189.94.204]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My conclusion: Canonical is blacklisted by http://www.uceprotect.net.
>>
>> According to <http://www.uceprotect.net/rblcheck.php?ipr=91.189.94.204>
>> it's not blacklisted now (at 2009-11-13 15:27:06+01:00)
>>
>>
>>> Should I file a bug somewhere in Launchpad? Because this problem is not
>>> software related. I don't know what the proper procedure is.
>>
>> I'd write to postmaster@canonical.com for this kind of problem
>
> See:
> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?asn=41231
>
> I'd write to 'Claus von Wolfhausen' instead...

I guess he would tell you to contact a responsible person at Canonical
to resolve the issue that got Canonical's server on that list.


Florian
--
<http://www.florian-diesch.de/software/shell-scripts/>

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Sorry for the late response, atm I have only intermittent internet
access

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 18:06 +0100, Amedee Van Gasse (ub) wrote:
> On Thu, November 12, 2009 15:02, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 13:33 +0100, Amedee Van Gasse (ub) wrote:
>
> >> Meanwhile I manually re-enabled delivery. I suppose that I won't get the
> >> backlog? Because that would probably DDOS my mailserver.
> >
> > None that I (Debian MM maintainer in 2004) know of.
>
> You may want to reconsider that statement:
> http://twitpic.com/pd34c
> Do you see that huge increase around 15:30? That's Ubuntu, hitting my
> mailserver.

Thanks for pointing me to that, 5 years are a long time in IT terms

Regs
Siggy

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users