Loïc Grenié wrote:
> 2009/1/10 NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net>:
>> On 01/10/2009 11:05 AM, Rashkae wrote:
>>> Hannah Josephine Dippe wrote:
>> [something... but it's been snipped]
>>> At the risk (err, make that, almost certainty) of feeding Trolls.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Top500_OS.png
>> Is dated. Instead, go to the source:
>> http://www.top500.org/stats/list/32/os
>> Operating System share for 11/2008
>
> As far as I understand the operating systems of the first poster
> are not for supercomputing but for mainframes or management.
>

Very true.

How much do you want to wager the 'super computing' engineers consider
those mere toys?

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Loïc Grenié wrote:
> 2009/1/10 NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net>:
>> On 01/10/2009 11:05 AM, Rashkae wrote:
>>> Hannah Josephine Dippe wrote:
>> [something... but it's been snipped]
>>> At the risk (err, make that, almost certainty) of feeding Trolls.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Top500_OS.png
>> Is dated. Instead, go to the source:
>> http://www.top500.org/stats/list/32/os
>> Operating System share for 11/2008
>
> As far as I understand the operating systems of the first poster
> are not for supercomputing but for mainframes or management.
>

Very true.

How much do you want to wager the 'super computing' engineers consider
those mere toys?


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users