New object-rotate-left icon set draft
Based on object-flip* model. I have not done the right version because
it depends on this set. Comments welcome. Luya _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:45 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Based on object-flip* model. I have not done the right version because > it depends on this > set. Comments welcome. > > Luya 32x32 and 48x48 are have blurry the vertical lines on the left, 22x22 is a little blurry on the top. The bent part seems strange, the white outline has inconsistent width throughout the icon (let inkscape make it by duplicating the object, putting it bellow, adding an outline to have desirable look, then transform outline to object and remove any holes). Martin _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
Martin Sourada a écrit :
> 32x32 and 48x48 are have blurry the vertical lines on the left, 22x22 is > a little blurry on the top. The bent part seems strange, the white > outline has inconsistent width throughout the icon (let inkscape make it > by duplicating the object, putting it bellow, adding an outline to have > desirable look, then transform outline to object and remove any holes). > > Martin 32x32 and 48x48 should be crisp. Top should look fine on 22x22 and the white outline issue has been addressed. Luya _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:45 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Based on object-flip* model. I have not done the right version because > it depends on this > set. Comments welcome. The horizontal arm seems a bit too short and the curve not... curvy enough. It's hard to tell if this is a "rotate left" or a "drop here" icon. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@gmail.com> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams a écrit :
> The horizontal arm seems a bit too short and the curve not... curvy > enough. It's hard to tell if this is a "rotate left" or a "drop here" > icon. > > Could you specify which version? On right side from top to bottom: large(48x48), medium(32x32), small(22x22), extra-small(16x16). Also check the reply with updated version. Luya _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:34 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Martin Sourada a écrit : > > 32x32 and 48x48 are have blurry the vertical lines on the left, 22x22 is > > a little blurry on the top. The bent part seems strange, the white > > outline has inconsistent width throughout the icon (let inkscape make it > > by duplicating the object, putting it bellow, adding an outline to have > > desirable look, then transform outline to object and remove any holes). > > > > Martin > 32x32 and 48x48 should be crisp. Top should look fine on 22x22 and the white > outline issue has been addressed. > > Luya To better explain what I thought (and I also agree with Ignacio's comment) I reworked the 256x256 version. The files you attached seem to be same like in the original mail so my version does not include the fix you talk about. I attach it. Martin _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
Martin Sourada a écrit*:
To better explain what I thought (and I also agree with Ignacio's comment) I reworked the 256x256 version. The files you attached seem to be same like in the original mail so my version does not include the fix you talk about. I attach it. Martin Here is updated version. Both 22x22 and 16x16 have been modified and got their trunk shortened. Luya _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:35 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Martin Sourada a écrit : > > > > To better explain what I thought (and I also agree with Ignacio's > > comment) I reworked the 256x256 version. The files you attached seem to > > be same like in the original mail so my version does not include the fix > > you talk about. I attach it. > > > > Martin > Here is updated version. Both 22x22 and 16x16 have been modified and > got their trunk shortened. > > Luya > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-art-list mailing list > Fedora-art-list@redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list The shape is now OK I think. Now that I look at it, for consistency you might want to either make the 256x256 arrow bigger or in other sizes smaller. The 48x48 need some fixes with pixel grid alignment (same place as with your last try), similarly, but to less extent with 32x32. 24x24 would perhaps need further tweaking to look more like the other arrows - it's thicker both than the bigger and lesser sizes. I'd also move it a little to the left and the top part is blurry. The 16x16 seems fine :) Martin _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
Martin Sourada a écrit*:
The shape is now OK I think. Now that I look at it, for consistency you might want to either make the 256x256 arrow bigger or in other sizes smaller. The 48x48 need some fixes with pixel grid alignment (same place as with your last try), similarly, but to less extent with 32x32. 24x24 would perhaps need further tweaking to look more like the other arrows - it's thicker both than the bigger and lesser sizes. I'd also move it a little to the left and the top part is blurry. The 16x16 seems fine :) Martin 256x256 kept the same size. Reduce arrow size for both 48x48 and 32x32 instead. 24x24 got tweaked. Luya _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
New object-rotate-left icon set draft
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:02 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Martin Sourada a écrit : > > > > The shape is now OK I think. Now that I look at it, for consistency you > > might want to either make the 256x256 arrow bigger or in other sizes > > smaller. The 48x48 need some fixes with pixel grid alignment (same place > > as with your last try), similarly, but to less extent with 32x32. 24x24 > > would perhaps need further tweaking to look more like the other arrows - > > it's thicker both than the bigger and lesser sizes. I'd also move it a > > little to the left and the top part is blurry. The 16x16 seems fine :) > > > > Martin > > > 256x256 kept the same size. Reduce arrow size for both 48x48 and 32x32 > instead. > 24x24 got tweaked. > > Luya I attach further tweaks to improve the icon clarity. Martin _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.