On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote:
<snip>
> With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say
> there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers
> that are active. I'm desperate to get this working.
> TIA,
> Suzie
How about
qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to
There is also a postfix list as well.
Cheers,
B.J.
CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 athlon 08:13:27 up 4 days, 11:53,
1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.27, 0.24
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:16 PM
Jeff
Email Problem
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Susan Day <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>
> wrote:
>>
>> qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
>> migrate your system to postfix.
>
> postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail.
postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
many other postfix experts.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
> Susan
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:17 PM
Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Email Problem
Susan Day wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>wrote:
>
>> 2010/2/26 Susan Day <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi;
>>> The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
>>> reach their destination:
>>>
>>> [root qmail-send]# tail current
>>>
>>> @400000004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462
>>>
>>> @400000004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from
>>> <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com> qp 23629 uid 508
>>>
>>> @400000004b87b3d33b7f700c starting delivery 4: msg 97881462 to remote
>>> suzieprogrammer@gmail.com
>>>
>>> @400000004b87b3d33b7f7bc4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/255
>>>
>>> @400000004b87b3d4338aec64 delivery 4: success:
>>>
>> 209.85.216.35_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_OK_1267184586_6si34162 00pxi.53/
>>
>> remote end accepted message.
>>
>>> messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> Remote smtp server is not working correctly or spamfilter on it kills
>> message?
>>
>
> No.
How do you know? Remote end accepted responsibility. If it does not get
delivered, it is their problem.
>
>> Note that it can take a bit time until gmail delivers it to mailbox.
>>
>
> Gmail's very quick and it's been an hour now. Usually takes a second.
Check spam box. Contact gmail postmaster. Nothing to do with the qmail
installation.
> Another very strange thing about this is that the contact page refreshes to
> itself when I try to email (through the form elt). If I pull the email send
> stuff out of the script where the form goes, it doesn't refresh to itself;
> rather, it prints what is written in the script to print.
>
> With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say there
> don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers that are
> active. I'm desperate to get this working.
You are mistaken. The qmail list and the postfix list are very much
active. Only sendmail does not have a discussion list.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:18 PM
Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Email Problem
B.J. McClure wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say
>> there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers
>> that are active. I'm desperate to get this working.
>> TIA,
>> Suzie
>
> How about
>
> qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to
That would be the wrong list. qmail@list.cr.yp.to would the correct one.
Send email to qmail-subscribe@list.cr.yp.to to subscribe.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:25 PM
Susan Day
Email Problem
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jeff <jlar310@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Susan Day <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>
> wrote:
>>
>> qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
>> migrate your system to postfix.
>
> postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail.
postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
many other postfix experts.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Same with cr.yp.to's list. No. If they worked I'd be there. Here's my question again:
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does reach their destination:
[root qmail-send]# tail current*
@400000004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462
@400000004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com> qp 23629 uid 508
@400000004b87b3d33b7f700c starting delivery 4: msg 97881462 to remotesuzieprogrammer@gmail.com
@400000004b87b3d33b7f7bc4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/255
/service/qmail-send: up (pid 21589) 60864 seconds
/service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 21596) 60864 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 21593) 60864 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd/log: up (pid 21595) 60864 seconds
/service/qmail-pop3d: up (pid 21590) 60864 seconds
/service/qmail-pop3d/log: up (pid 21591) 60864 seconds
messages in queue: 0
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
Why?TIA,Susan
*
> Susan
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:26 PM
Eero Volotinen
Email Problem
2010/2/26 Susan Day <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>
> wrote:
>>
>> qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
>> migrate your system to postfix.
>
> postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail.
> Susan
Postfix is under active development, qmail is not developed anymore by
original author.
If you want live with qmail, maybe you can use consult to solve your
problems with qmail.
--
Eero
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:32 PM
Eero Volotinen
Email Problem
> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Same with
> cr.yp.to's list. No. If they worked I'd be there. Here's my question again:
> The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
> reach their destination:
>
> [root qmail-send]# tail current
>
> @400000004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462
>
> @400000004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from
> <suzieprogrammer@gmail.com> qp 23629 uid 508
>
> @400000004b87b3d33b7f700c starting delivery 4: msg 97881462 to
> remotesuzieprogrammer@gmail.com
>
> @400000004b87b3d33b7f7bc4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/255
>
> @400000004b87b3d4338aec64 delivery 4: success:
> 209.85.216.35_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_OK_1267184586_6si34162 00pxi.53/
Please stop spamming centos mailing list with same question.
As I said line "209.85.216.35_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_OK_1267184586_6si34162 00pxi.53/"
means that message is delivered to remote smtp server.
It's not your mailserver problem after that.
--
Eero
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:32 PM
Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Email Problem
>> postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
>> developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
>> many other postfix experts.
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
>
>
> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Same with cr.yp.to's
> list. No. If they worked I'd be there. Here's my question again:
>
Sorry, I do not see your post on the qmail list. Certainly not last week
nor in January either.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:39 PM
Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Email Problem
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>>> postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
>>> developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
>>> many other postfix experts.
>>>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
>>
>> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
>> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Same with cr.yp.to's
>> list. No. If they worked I'd be there. Here's my question again:
>>
>
> Sorry, I do not see your post on the qmail list. Certainly not last week
> nor in January either.
Nor any post on the postfix list for that matter according to the
postfix list archive. Too much traffic for you to stay subscribed I bet.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
02-26-2010, 12:45 PM
Kai Schaetzl
Email Problem
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400:
> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either.
Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression
that you are mostly asking very basic questions that a sysadmin *should*
know or at least know how to google them up. I get the impression that you
are not trying hard enough to understand your software. You cannot just
throw any problem you encounter at the next list you find. For your last
two questions (about the python script and this one which also seems to be
related to a script you wrote or use) I get the impression that in both
cases you simply may have bugs in the code or use it incorrectly. These
are then not questions for a mailing list about the MTA nor for this list,
but problems with your code and it might be more helpful to ask on a
mailing list/newsgroup for coders of that language.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Email Problem
