Hi,

I have to build a private cloud, I have experience with Eucalyptus...and our apps are in production in Amazon...but now Open Stack is there...someone has experience working with both...can you tell me something to decide one or another???


Thanks

--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

On 2011-06-18, at 18:44, Jesus arteche wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have to build a private cloud, I have experience with Eucalyptus...and our apps are in production in Amazon...but now Open Stack is there...someone has experience working with both...can you tell me something to decide one or another???


Eucalyptu is more mature but development stalled. OS is very promising, but unstable, and I wouldn't consider it production ready. If you are experienced sysadmin, and not affraid of some manual sql etc. you might try it.

pz
--
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierała






--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

At least, it appears [1] OpenStack will be the cloud technology used by
Ubuntu in the near future which means it will eventually be
production-ready.

[1]
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mapping-babel-10017967/ubuntu-shifts-to-openstack-for-cloud-10022422/?tag=mncol;txt


--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Maybe try proxmox? The latest KVM kernel they use is based on Ubuntu 2.6.35 though its a Debian Lenny based distro
Decent web interface, always track latest KVM
See*http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page



2011/6/19 Arnaud Soyez <weboide@codealpha.net>


At least, it appears [1] OpenStack will be the cloud technology used by

Ubuntu in the near future which means it will eventually be

production-ready.



[1]

http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mapping-babel-10017967/ubuntu-shifts-to-openstack-for-cloud-10022422/?tag=mncol;txt







--

ubuntu-server mailing list

ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server

More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam



--
Adon Metcalfe
Labyrinth Data Services Pty Ltd
http://www.labyrinthdata.net.au


--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

On 2011-06-19, at 03:46, Adon Metcalfe wrote:

> Maybe try proxmox? The latest KVM kernel they use is based on Ubuntu 2.6.35 though its a Debian Lenny based distro
>
> Decent web interface, always track latest KVM

Proxmox is not cloud technology. It's hypervisor with web gui.

Regards,
--
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierała






--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

On 06/18/2011 10:53 PM, Tomasz 'Zen' Napierała wrote:

On 2011-06-18, at 18:44, Jesus arteche wrote:


Hi,

I have to build a private cloud, I have experience with Eucalyptus...and our apps are in production in Amazon...but now Open Stack is there...someone has experience working with both...can you tell me something to decide one or another???


Eucalyptu is more mature but development stalled. OS is very promising, but unstable, and I wouldn't consider it production ready. If you are experienced sysadmin, and not affraid of some manual sql etc. you might try it.

pz
I wouldn't really Eucalyptus' development is stalled. V3 is coming out
soon (couple of months maybe?) and it brings along pretty good features
(Cloud components HA finally yaay). OpenStack IMO leans towards large
scale deployments (think ISPs) .. while Eucalyptus IMO is more mature
today, and leans towards Enterprise customers


--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

On 2011-06-20, at 12:58, Ahmed Kamal wrote:

>>
>> Eucalyptu is more mature but development stalled. OS is very promising, but unstable, and I wouldn't consider it production ready. If you are experienced sysadmin, and not affraid of some manual sql etc. you might try it.
>>
>> pz
> I wouldn't really Eucalyptus' development is stalled. V3 is coming out soon (couple of months maybe?) and it brings along pretty good features (Cloud components HA finally yaay). OpenStack IMO leans towards large scale deployments (think ISPs) .. while Eucalyptus IMO is more mature today, and leans towards Enterprise customers


You are absolutely right, but the problem with Eucalyptus is that I wouldn't call their development model "open". On the other side OpenStack is backed by really large and prominent companies, and it's development is fast and direction is deterministic

Regards,
--
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierała






--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam