Main Inclusion Report for Bacula
With all due respect, isn't this a problem if and only if default and less secure (or bad) configurations are used and/or the database server powering Bacula is a shared system with non-trusted users?
On Feb 5, 2008 8:35 AM, Chuck Short <zulcss@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
For the server package review specification
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerPackageReview) we evaluated the Bacula
backup solution. However,Bacula was rejected due to a feature in
Bacula which exposed clear text passwords through the command line.
This will not be resolved upstream in Debian.
If people have an alternative that they would like to suggest please do so.
Regards
Chuck
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
|