Please think before you send bugs to Debian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I did not mean to tell you off, but express my confidence in all the
members of the MOTU team.
Sarah Hobbs schrieb:
> Come now. I was merely raising the question as to whether a note in the
> wiki (which a lot of people (especially established MOTU's) don't read,
> as it's still being rearranged, is the most useful way of conveying this
> That being said, the reason why I didn't suggest something else was that
> I hadn't come up with a better way of conveying the information to
> everyone. Clearly, not eloquently enough. I wasn't suggesting
> throwing people out, etc - if I *was* suggesting such a thing, then I
> would have come out and said that.
> Take it, or leave it, as you wish - but please don't jump down my throat
> for something that I did not say. That is not fair.
"We apparently have various people who don't think before sending
changes" is the sentence that irked me. For my taste it draws a much too
negative picture of the team.
I agree that this is an important issue and that we should try to come
up with solutions to fix it.
Here's what I just did:
- asked Alexander Sack to add the list of ice* packages to
UbuntuPackagingChanges and add some explanation to it
- referenced UbuntuPackagingChanges from more wiki pages
(UbuntuDevelopment/Merging, UbuntuDevelopment/KnowledgeBase, ,
- wrote an small note on how to use submittodebian on
- I'll also write James Westby to ask if he plans to add some words
about this to his "Working with Debian" session
What else could we improve?
Have a nice day,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu