Better dietlibc in Hardy
Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
> after reading Klaus Trainer's email in ubuntu-motu mailing list , I
> started to look at the bug  given. I realized this was not due to
> util-vserver but to dietlibc instead.
> dietlibc is compiled without stack protector (-fno-stack-protector flag
> and WANT_SSP option disabled in source code) and this leads to weird
> behaviours in packages compiled with dietlibc support, see  and 
> for concrete examples, but I think many packages are affected.
> I prepared a spec  which tries to focus the issue and to provide a
> candidate solution for review. I also uploaded involved packages  on
> my PPA  for testing purposes.
> If feedbacks are positive, I would like to upload a fixed version of
> dietlibc and, once it will be built on all architectures, manage
> rebuilds of the packages which build-depend on it.
I concluded some tests on my PPA  and I find a possible fix for
dietlibc and the packages which depends on it, as I reported in the
related spec .
I'm going to upload a new dietlibc package after Alpha 1 release and,
once fully built on all ports, manage rebuilds of the packages which
depends on it . If you are intrested in one of the package involved,
feel free to report additional comments/tests you feel important.
Also, please inform me as soon as possible if you are aware of a better
solution to fix this issue.
>  http://tinyurl.com/yrqxgv
>  https://launchpad.net/bugs/88595
>  https://launchpad.net/bugs/82023
>  https://launchpad.net/bugs/86823
>  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/better-dietlibc
>  http://tinyurl.com/32ljk4
>  https://launchpad.net/~dktrkranz/+archive
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu