FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Kernel Team

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-28-2012, 01:46 PM
Colin Ian King
 
Default Final set of results from the Power Management Blueprint

Hi,

Now beta2 is nearly here I ran some (very simple) tests last night and
this morning on Unity 2D vs 3D to see how they compare in terms of power
consumption on a HP Mini 210 (Atom N450) and a Lenovo X220i
(Sandybridge, i3).


Data:

http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/power-benchmarking/unity-beta2-results/unity-2d-vs-3d.ods


Results:

http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/power-benchmarking/unity-beta2-results/unity-beta2-2d-vs-3d-results.txt


Quick Summary:

For 3D animation and busy rendering (which we suspect this keeps the
compositor busy) Unity 3D consumes more power than 2D. This is more
apparent on newer Intel Sandybridge chipsets because 2D seems to keep
the GPU powered down which is known to save 25-40% of total system power
due to the i915 RC6 power saving mode.


For some operations, such as desktop zooming, 2D is more expensive
because we don't have GPU assist to scale images.


Finally, for idle systems, 2D and 3D are comparable in power consumption.

..but see the unity-beta2-2d-vs-3d-results.txt for more details. Oh,
and the sigma (std.deviation) is rendered poorly on web-browsers.


Colin

--
kernel-team mailing list
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org