FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Kernel Team

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-08-2011, 09:18 AM
Paolo Pisati
 
Default Fix FTBS caused by new binutils

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
SRU Justification:

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669912

Impact: since natty the default toolchain for arm went from 4.4 to 4.5,
and the switch broke maverick/ti-omap4 compilation


Fix: cherry-picked from natty - 1ebe13dea156358f1044a7a755f02945ad3890e4

Test case: try to compile maverick/ti-omap4 on a natty box and you will get:

arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S:36: Error: selected processor does
not support ARM mode `smc #0'

make[3]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

--
bye,
p.
 
Old 06-08-2011, 12:54 PM
Tim Gardner
 
Default Fix FTBS caused by new binutils

On 06/08/2011 03:18 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote:

SRU Justification:

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669912

Impact: since natty the default toolchain for arm went from 4.4 to 4.5,
and the switch broke maverick/ti-omap4 compilation

Fix: cherry-picked from natty - 1ebe13dea156358f1044a7a755f02945ad3890e4

Test case: try to compile maverick/ti-omap4 on a natty box and you will
get:

arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S:36: Error: selected processor does
not support ARM mode `smc #0'
make[3]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....



You're wanting to build a Maverick kernel using a Natty compiler and
binutils, right? I believe this is purely for developer convenience and
does not meet SRU criteria. Why not use a Maverick chroot ?


rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com

--
kernel-team mailing list
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
 
Old 06-08-2011, 01:17 PM
Paolo Pisati
 
Default Fix FTBS caused by new binutils

On 06/08/2011 02:54 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:


You're wanting to build a Maverick kernel using a Natty compiler and
binutils, right? I believe this is purely for developer convenience and
does not meet SRU criteria. Why not use a Maverick chroot ?


because it's easier to do it not in a chroot.

anyway, if it doesn't meet SRU criteria it's not a big deal, i'll keep
it in my local tree.



--
bye,
p.

--
kernel-team mailing list
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org