FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Kernel Team

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-01-2010, 11:12 PM
Leann Ogasawara
 
Default Better management of bug to upstream stable patch relationship

On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:51 +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Another issue that arises from preferring fixes coming though upstream stable
> is, that often in those patches, there is no reference to Launchpad bugs that
> are open for that issue.
> If the patch originated from us, we add a BugLink which is preserved, but if the
> patch already went upstream for other reasons or is only suggested by us for
> stable inclusion, there will be no such reference. Still it would be good to
> have a better view on which bugs should be fixed by a certain upstream stable patch.
> So the idea again would be to have a tag indicating that there is a fix expected
> from upstream stable and then probably have a formalized comment (maybe the git
> log --pretty=short of the patch in Linus tree) to allow automated scripts to
> find those bug reports and patch references.
>
> Comments?

Would you want to use the 'upstream-stable' tag you proposed in an
earlier thread [1] or did you have something else in mind?

Regardless, this all seems reasonable to me. In the past I had actually
used even more granularity and tagged the bugs with the upstream stable
version that the fix would be landing in, eg. 2.6.32.13 or what have
you.

Thanks,
Leann

[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2010-May/010842.html


--
kernel-team mailing list
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
 
Old 06-02-2010, 07:49 AM
Stefan Bader
 
Default Better management of bug to upstream stable patch relationship

On 06/02/2010 01:12 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:51 +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> Another issue that arises from preferring fixes coming though upstream stable
>> is, that often in those patches, there is no reference to Launchpad bugs that
>> are open for that issue.
>> If the patch originated from us, we add a BugLink which is preserved, but if the
>> patch already went upstream for other reasons or is only suggested by us for
>> stable inclusion, there will be no such reference. Still it would be good to
>> have a better view on which bugs should be fixed by a certain upstream stable patch.
>> So the idea again would be to have a tag indicating that there is a fix expected
>> from upstream stable and then probably have a formalized comment (maybe the git
>> log --pretty=short of the patch in Linus tree) to allow automated scripts to
>> find those bug reports and patch references.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> Would you want to use the 'upstream-stable' tag you proposed in an
> earlier thread [1] or did you have something else in mind?

I was thinking of a different tag. The upstream stable generically indicating
what you wrote below. This is a tracking bug for an upstream stable release. For
that purpose I did not think it would be necessary to know by tag which one.

> Regardless, this all seems reasonable to me. In the past I had actually
> used even more granularity and tagged the bugs with the upstream stable
> version that the fix would be landing in, eg. 2.6.32.13 or what have
> you.

The other tag I thought of more saying, this report contains a reference to an
upstream patch which either was sent with "cc: stable.." on the sob line or now
forwarded there for inclusion. So it would get added before the patch lands in
stable or at least needs to be there before applying a batch of upstream stable
that contains it. That way, before actually applying one could do a search to
get a list of expected patches and their bug reports which then could be used to
add additional buglinks (additional to the tracking bug) to the commits.

Stefan

>
> Thanks,
> Leann
>
> [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2010-May/010842.html
>


--
kernel-team mailing list
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org