Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 18:35 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bader:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:41 +0100, Arne Redlich wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >> I'm the upstream maintainer of the iSCSI Enterprise Target (IET) ,
> >> which is shipped as "iscsitarget" in Ubuntu. Recently we've been getting
> >> some bug reports related to the Ubuntu flavour on our mailing list .
> > Thanks for checking into this. Cc'ing the kernel team mailing list so
> > that the stable maintainer can look into adding this to past releases.
> Hi Ben,
> in Hardy LUM I found this change to be present already. It was part of some
> updates, which Chuck did.
> commit 1fc338f1398043b74c0e35847db6323e36654651
> Author: Stefan Bader <email@example.com>
> Date: Wed Apr 9 13:26:21 2008 -0400
> UBUNTU: Update iscsitarget drive
> OriginalAuthor: Chuck Short <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Bug: #208281
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Short <email@example.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Some changes seem not to have gone upstream at this time. I am attaching the
> diff between intrepid and hardy. Some changes are rather cosmetical but others
> might be important.
The patch looks rather good, in particular the modifications to blockio
I had forgotten to check in the ubuntu kernel package.
But the point is that this very issue was already fixed - slightly
differently - shortly after (or even before?) the 2.6.24 release in our
upstream repository. Hence my proposal of more collaboration instead of
this duplication of effort.
> >> After some research I discovered that there's already a bug report in
> >> launchpad . However, digging a little deeper I found out that the bug
> >> is not present in the referenced package but that the kernel part of
> >> iscsitarget is also shipped with the linux-image-2.6.x package,
> >> containing at least the mentioned bug in the procfs code (it doesn't
> >> take care of the net namespaces, probably overlooked when attempting to
> >> port IET to kernels >= 2.6.24). Below is a patch for that.
> >> I also noticed that the sources you're using are a rather old version
> >> and is not from one of our releases or our repository  but from some
> >> third party .
> >> I'm interested in avoiding such problems in the future, not only because
> >> of my upstream work for IET but also as a Ubuntu user. As a starting
> >> point I'd of course like to encourage you to include a more recent
> >> release / version from our repository in jaunty. In case of any problems
> >> (e.g. the code needs to be ported to the latest kernel version) I'd like
> >> our projects to work more closely together so we can avoid such
> >> breakage. Please feel free to contact me or the project's mailing list
> >> (currently subscribers only) for any IET related issues.
> >> Thanks in advance & best regards,
> >> Arne Redlich
> >>  http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net
> >>  http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.iscsi.iscsi-target.devel
> >>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iscsitarget/+bug/278625
> >>  svn://svn.berlios.de/iscsitarget/
> >>  http://www.amherst.edu/~swplotner/iscsitarget/download/iscsitarget/
kernel-team mailing list
11-17-2008, 06:46 PM
iscsitarget shipped with Ubuntu's linux-image
Arne Redlich wrote:
> Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 18:35 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bader:
> The patch looks rather good, in particular the modifications to blockio
> I had forgotten to check in the ubuntu kernel package.
> But the point is that this very issue was already fixed - slightly
> differently - shortly after (or even before?) the 2.6.24 release in our
> upstream repository. Hence my proposal of more collaboration instead of
> this duplication of effort.
sure thing. I am sorry this went this way. Still have to separate the necessary
from the cosmetically parts (I believe only the bits below should matter, but
thats only a quick guess.
As for the coordination part, I agree and we should hopefully do better for Jaunty.