disk-manager by default
I haven't a clue when/if it will get included, but I really like the concept. If AutoFsck (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck) gets included, it would be a good place to integrate the options window.
On 2/9/08, Piotr Zaryk <oponek@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I noticed the disk-manager is checked as milestone for alpha5. Is there a chance to get it included in Ubuntu? The app is very stable and it's a great idea IMHO. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/disk-manager-by-default -- Regards, Zaryk -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss |
disk-manager by default
On Saturday 09 February 2008 16:43, Piotr Zaryk wrote:
> Hi, > > I noticed the disk-manager is checked as milestone for alpha5. Is there a > chance to get it included in Ubuntu? The app is very stable and it's a > great idea IMHO. > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/disk-manager-by-default Specs for Hardy were largely done back in October/November of last year and this spec was proposed last week, so this proposal is months late for Hardy. Considering it's not even in Ubuntu at all at this point, I'd suggest it's extraordinarily unlikely. Scott K -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss |
disk-manager by default
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday 09 February 2008 16:43, Piotr Zaryk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed the disk-manager is checked as milestone for alpha5. Is there a >> chance to get it included in Ubuntu? The app is very stable and it's a >> great idea IMHO. >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/disk-manager-by-default > > Specs for Hardy were largely done back in October/November of last year and > this spec was proposed last week, so this proposal is months late for Hardy. > Considering it's not even in Ubuntu at all at this point, I'd suggest it's > extraordinarily unlikely. > > Scott K > I've put a comment on the whiteboard of the spec, effectively saying the same thing. I wish people wouldn't blog about incorrect things, though - - it would be *extraordinarily* unlikely to happen at this point. Hobbsee -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHrnQ37/o1b30rzoURAhw4AJ9JELmUpDYG9JIfD9rJM9pBSNoNzwCfdlOX cMe8YldZz/Hmz8zbvRE+FIU= =j1Mx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.