FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-05-2008, 11:37 PM
Remco
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

Hello, I'm new here,

I would like to comment on the decision to make Transmission the
default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It
seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm biased) that Deluge is more popular
and more familiar (looks like µTorrent & Azureus). Transmission has a
bit of a clunky interface by opening another window for
torrent-details. This didn't work for GIMP, and it doesn't work for
Transmission either.

Deluge supports some features many users need like DHT and blocklists.
Plus, it has this plugin-system going for them, kind of like Firefox.
Add to that the fact that you can run it on Windows, so you can also
include it in the Windows autostart-menu of the cd.

What are your thoughts? I hope I didn't jump into this mailing-list
too loudly...

Cheers,
Remco
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-06-2008, 12:20 AM
"Vadim Peretokin"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

Deluge is more popular, checking with the sample given from popcon.ubuntu.com.

If I remember right, Transmission was chosen over Deluge because the devs thought both had similar features, but Deluge had an option to password-protect the tray in some tab under preferences, which someone didn't like. So..


(I tested Transmission myself later; the client promptly froze for me. At first Compiz was blamed, but after I repeated the same with Metacity, the thread got really quiet)

On Feb 5, 2008 7:37 PM, Remco <remco47@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello, I'm new here,

I would like to comment on the decision to make Transmission the

default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It
seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm biased) that Deluge is more popular
and more familiar (looks like µTorrent & Azureus). Transmission has a

bit of a clunky interface by opening another window for
torrent-details. This didn't work for GIMP, and it doesn't work for
Transmission either.

Deluge supports some features many users need like DHT and blocklists.

Plus, it has this plugin-system going for them, kind of like Firefox.
Add to that the fact that you can run it on Windows, so you can also
include it in the Windows autostart-menu of the cd.

What are your thoughts? I hope I didn't jump into this mailing-list

too loudly...

Cheers,
Remco
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss



--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-06-2008, 12:44 AM
"Bryan Quigley"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

My initial reaction was similar.* However, in transmissions favor
Memory usage (quick test)
Deluge at 23 Mb
Transmission at 7 Mb

The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated client.* I think one of the big factors is that deluge has a wizard to get you setup while transmission just works.


You also can't argue with file size:
Transmission: About 1 Mb
Deluge: About 13 Mb

Don't get me wrong I think Deluge is a better (more powerful, more extendable) bittorrent client, and most likely better tested as well.* However, transmission is going to be easier for first time torrent users, and that's what I think matters for the default Ubuntu CD.

-Bryan

On Feb 5, 2008 8:20 PM, Vadim Peretokin <vperetokin@gmail.com> wrote:

Deluge is more popular, checking with the sample given from popcon.ubuntu.com.

If I remember right, Transmission was chosen over Deluge because the devs thought both had similar features, but Deluge had an option to password-protect the tray in some tab under preferences, which someone didn't like. So..



(I tested Transmission myself later; the client promptly froze for me. At first Compiz was blamed, but after I repeated the same with Metacity, the thread got really quiet)


On Feb 5, 2008 7:37 PM, Remco <remco47@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello, I'm new here,

I would like to comment on the decision to make Transmission the


default bittorrent client in Hardy. Why was this program chosen? It
seems to me (though, as a fan, I'm biased) that Deluge is more popular
and more familiar (looks like µTorrent & Azureus). Transmission has a


bit of a clunky interface by opening another window for
torrent-details. This didn't work for GIMP, and it doesn't work for
Transmission either.

Deluge supports some features many users need like DHT and blocklists.


Plus, it has this plugin-system going for them, kind of like Firefox.
Add to that the fact that you can run it on Windows, so you can also
include it in the Windows autostart-menu of the cd.

What are your thoughts? I hope I didn't jump into this mailing-list


too loudly...

Cheers,
Remco
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com

Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss




--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss




--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-06-2008, 12:59 AM
Murat Gunes
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:20 -0500, Vadim Peretokin wrote:

> If I remember right, Transmission was chosen over Deluge because the
> devs thought both had similar features, but Deluge had an option to
> password-protect the tray in some tab under preferences, which someone
> didn't like. So..

For reference, that's a (distorted) reference to this post:

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2008-January/001375.html

m.


--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-06-2008, 01:40 PM
"Mackenzie Morgan"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

On Feb 5, 2008 8:44 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com> wrote:

The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated client.

But that interface was crappy.

I won't argue on the system requirements though.* Aside from the memory usage you noticed, I tend to renice Deluge because it likes to chew through cycles like it's the Cookie Monster going after some nice warm chocolate chip cookies.

--
Mackenzie Morgan
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff
apt-get moo
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-06-2008, 05:36 PM
"Jonathan Musther"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

I seem to be the only one who likes Transmission.* I really don't think
it's fair to call the interface crappy, it's difference from deluge,
but perhaps more in keeping with Ubuntu (and Gnome) in that it's main
window is simple, to get more technical info you have to open the
details window.* Let's be fair, 99% of users don't need to see that
technical info anyway, the only thing that they want to see is the
upload/download info and ETA.


Anyway, I like it!* :-)

On Feb 7, 2008 3:40 AM, Mackenzie Morgan <macoafi@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 5, 2008 8:44 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com> wrote:


The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated client.

But that interface was crappy.

I won't argue on the system requirements though.* Aside from the memory usage you noticed, I tend to renice Deluge because it likes to chew through cycles like it's the Cookie Monster going after some nice warm chocolate chip cookies.


--
Mackenzie Morgan
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff

apt-get moo

--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss




--
Slingshot - a unique game everyone enjoys *- and it's free :-)
http://www.slingshot-game.org
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-07-2008, 02:18 AM
"Vadim Peretokin"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

On Feb 6, 2008 1:36 PM, Jonathan Musther <jmusther@gmail.com> wrote:

I seem to be the only one who likes Transmission.* I really don't think
it's fair to call the interface crappy, it's difference from deluge,
but perhaps more in keeping with Ubuntu (and Gnome) in that it's main
window is simple, to get more technical info you have to open the
details window.* Let's be fair, 99% of users don't need to see that
technical info anyway, the only thing that they want to see is the
upload/download info and ETA.


Anyway, I like it!* :-)

So why does Transmission waste cycles then drawing the fancy progress bar?
*


On Feb 7, 2008 3:40 AM, Mackenzie Morgan <macoafi@gmail.com> wrote:


On Feb 5, 2008 8:44 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com> wrote:



The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated client.

But that interface was crappy.

I won't argue on the system requirements though.* Aside from the memory usage you noticed, I tend to renice Deluge because it likes to chew through cycles like it's the Cookie Monster going after some nice warm chocolate chip cookies.



--
Mackenzie Morgan
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff


apt-get moo

--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss





--
Slingshot - a unique game everyone enjoys *- and it's free :-)
http://www.slingshot-game.org

--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss




--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-08-2008, 03:10 AM
"A. Walton"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

On Feb 7, 2008 7:46 PM, Remco <remco47@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed I didn't actually send this to the list... here it is.
>
> Remco
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Remco <remco47@gmail.com>
> Date: Feb 6, 2008 3:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client
> To: Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 2:44 AM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My initial reaction was similar. However, in transmissions favor
> > Memory usage (quick test)
> > Deluge at 23 Mb
> > Transmission at 7 Mb
> >
> > The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated
> > client. I think one of the big factors is that deluge has a wizard to get
> > you setup while transmission just works.
>
> It's true that Deluge has a wizard (which you can skip if you really
> want). However, two of these settings are very important: Maximum
> Upload Speed and Maximum Connections. If you don't set a maximum
> upload speed, your download speed will plummet, and you'll have
> trouble reaching websites. And many cheap routers crash when they have
> to deal with the amount of connections bittorrent-traffic usually
> consists of. Not setting these right will make an app Just Not Work
> (tm).
>
> If there is consensus on which misfeatures really kill the chance of
> Deluge becoming the default app, I could direct the Deluge-devs to
> these concerns. Due to Deluge's modular architecture, anything can be
> moved from default to plugin.
>
> So far, I've seen:
> * High memory usage.
> * High file size.
> * Obscure features that should be a plugin.
> * Wizard-based configuration over sane-default.
>
> I've run Transmission, and one thing I like is that it chooses a
> random port, and opens it with NAT traversal. No configuration
> required. The rest of the application is too limited for my taste.
> With Deluge I can easily extend the features by selecting a few
> plugins. I think file size could be reduced by actually not including
> the plugins by default.
>
> I think, if the Deluge-devs would want to resolve these concerns,
> Deluge would be a far better choice.
> * It's more popular.
> * It has features people need that Transmission misses.
> * It's easily extendable.
> * It looks like µTorrent & Azureus.
> * It runs on Mac & Windows (helps acceptance by slow migration).
>
>
> Remco
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>

To be honest, I don't see the need to include a Bittorrent client by
default at all; it's always going to be this kind of war: "My client's
better and I'll tell you why". I think if Ubuntu's going to include
one at all (and waste the CD space on it for those users who don't
know what a torrent is, never used it before, and maybe never will),
it should be one that's small, wasting as little space as possible,
and extremely simple to use. Gnome-BT fit that bill, but is completely
unmaintained. The next rung up the ladder is Transmission (and even
the developer of Gnome-BT acknowledges this:
http://gnome-bt.sourceforge.net/ ).

Even if you disagree with the client, don't like it, don't use it, it
doesn't matter: as soon as you install Ubuntu, you're going to choose
your favorite client anyway. But you're not the average case here.
BitTorrent is widely accepted amongst some circles, especially us, the
Free Software world, as it's a great way to distribute new versions of
our software. It's not as widely accepted outside of our world: your
mother would probably look at you cross-eyed if you told her to
"download the latest version of Ubuntu with BitTorrent." In the latter
case, Transmission wins that hands down.

Continuing this discussion ad nauseum may make you feel better, but I
don't think it's likely to change much. The situation is, Ubuntu is
for Human Beings, not just geeks and torrenters. The Deluge packages
are in the archives, anyone who's upset about Transmission can easily
go grab a different client, and Synaptic/apt-cache brings up a whole
list of them to choose from. Everyone's got an opinion on this one,
which is why it's probably best to stick with the absolute bare
minimum (or none at all, I'm hugely in favor of saving the CD space
for other, more important things, and letting someone double click a
"Torrent" file and have a nice dialog pop up saying "You currently do
not have a handler registered for file type "Torrent", would you like
to install a program that manages these files?"). But then again it's
probably just easier to ship Transmission, especially when that
average human model's not going to have a clue which torrent client to
pick out of the lineup, and in the likely case they'd actually want to
use it, they just want to download something and get it over with.

2c.
-A. Walton

--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 
Old 02-09-2008, 05:54 PM
"Jonathan Musther"
 
Default Transmission as default bittorrent client

I know I was defending Transmission, but I just had a bad experience with it, checked on their forums, and it seems to be a fairly common thing.

I don't normally turn off my computer when I'm downloading something big, but yesterday I was downloading a torrent which was coming rather slowly, and decided I'd continue in the morning.* I closed transmission properly, and shut down.* Upon reopening Transmission it had lost most of the 350mb I had downloaded, it had only managed to preserve 20.


As I said, there are other people complaining about this on their forums.* So, while I prefer the look and feel of Transmission, I've now started using deluge...

I agree with Remco in that it would be perfectly adequate to simply have a dialogue prompting to install a torrent handler, as we now do with certain audio-video codecs.* After all, if you're torrenting, you must have a net connection.



On Feb 8, 2008 5:10 PM, A. Walton <awalton@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 7, 2008 7:46 PM, Remco <remco47@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed I didn't actually send this to the list... here it is.
>

> Remco
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Remco <remco47@gmail.com>
> Date: Feb 6, 2008 3:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Transmission as default bittorrent client

> To: Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 2:44 AM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com> wrote:

> > My initial reaction was similar. *However, in transmissions favor
> > Memory usage (quick test)
> > Deluge at 23 Mb
> > Transmission at 7 Mb
> >
> > The interface also seems more transitional from the previous integrated

> > client. *I think one of the big factors is that deluge has a wizard to get
> > you setup while transmission just works.
>
> It's true that Deluge has a wizard (which you can skip if you really

> want). However, two of these settings are very important: Maximum
> Upload Speed and Maximum Connections. If you don't set a maximum
> upload speed, your download speed will plummet, and you'll have

> trouble reaching websites. And many cheap routers crash when they have
> to deal with the amount of connections bittorrent-traffic usually
> consists of. Not setting these right will make an app Just Not Work

> (tm).
>
> If there is consensus on which misfeatures really kill the chance of
> Deluge becoming the default app, I could direct the Deluge-devs to
> these concerns. Due to Deluge's modular architecture, anything can be

> moved from default to plugin.
>
> So far, I've seen:
> * High memory usage.
> * High file size.
> * Obscure features that should be a plugin.
> * Wizard-based configuration over sane-default.

>
> I've run Transmission, and one thing I like is that it chooses a
> random port, and opens it with NAT traversal. No configuration
> required. The rest of the application is too limited for my taste.

> With Deluge I can easily extend the features by selecting a few
> plugins. I think file size could be reduced by actually not including
> the plugins by default.
>
> I think, if the Deluge-devs would want to resolve these concerns,

> Deluge would be a far better choice.
> * It's more popular.
> * It has features people need that Transmission misses.
> * It's easily extendable.
> * It looks like µTorrent & Azureus.

> * It runs on Mac & Windows (helps acceptance by slow migration).
>
>
> Remco
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com

> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>


To be honest, I don't see the need to include a Bittorrent client by
default at all; it's always going to be this kind of war: "My client's
better and I'll tell you why". I think if Ubuntu's going to include

one at all (and waste the CD space on it for those users who don't
know what a torrent is, never used it before, and maybe never will),
it should be one that's small, wasting as little space as possible,

and extremely simple to use. Gnome-BT fit that bill, but is completely
unmaintained. The next rung up the ladder is Transmission (and even
the developer of Gnome-BT acknowledges this:
http://gnome-bt.sourceforge.net/ ).


Even if you disagree with the client, don't like it, don't use it, it
doesn't matter: as soon as you install Ubuntu, you're going to choose
your favorite client anyway. But you're not the average case here.

BitTorrent is widely accepted amongst some circles, especially us, the
Free Software world, as it's a great way to distribute new versions of
our software. It's not as widely accepted outside of our world: your

mother would probably look at you cross-eyed if you told her to
"download the latest version of Ubuntu with BitTorrent." In the latter
case, Transmission wins that hands down.

Continuing this discussion ad nauseum may make you feel better, but I

don't think it's likely to change much. The situation is, Ubuntu is
for Human Beings, not just geeks and torrenters. The Deluge packages
are in the archives, anyone who's upset about Transmission can easily

go grab a different client, and Synaptic/apt-cache brings up a whole
list of them to choose from. Everyone's got an opinion on this one,
which is why it's probably best to stick with the absolute bare
minimum (or none at all, I'm hugely in favor of saving the CD space

for other, more important things, and letting someone double click a
"Torrent" file and have a nice dialog pop up saying "You currently do
not have a handler registered for file type "Torrent", would you like

to install a program that manages these files?"). But then again it's
probably just easier to ship Transmission, especially when that
average human model's not going to have a clue which torrent client to

pick out of the lineup, and in the likely case they'd actually want to
use it, they just want to download something and get it over with.

2c.
-A. Walton


--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss



--
Slingshot - a unique game everyone enjoys *- and it's free :-)
http://www.slingshot-game.org
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org