FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-04-2008, 10:43 AM
Matt Zimmerman
 
Default Patch checkbox for bug attachments ( No Attention)

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:03:31AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Daniel Holbach [2008-01-31 7:26 +0100]:
> > Am Montag, den 28.01.2008, 22:09 +0000 schrieb James Westby:
> > > There seem to be some false positives in here, for instance #183615.
> > > Is this a bug in the launchpad bug search that you use do you think?
> >
> > Seems that http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11413037/foo.txt on
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/183615 had
> > the 'patch tag' on, I'm sure that others do too.
> >
> > Martin: is this a bug in the apport bug filing?
>
> No, it's not. This foo.txt attachment is not filed by apport. I guess
> the person who attached it just accidentally enabled the patch checkbox.

I've seen quite a lot of this around. I think that many people who add
attachments don't know what a patch is, and see no harm in checking the box.

--
- mdz

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
 
Old 02-04-2008, 04:42 PM
Bryce Harrington
 
Default Patch checkbox for bug attachments ( No Attention)

On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:43:12AM +0000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:03:31AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Daniel Holbach [2008-01-31 7:26 +0100]:
> > > Am Montag, den 28.01.2008, 22:09 +0000 schrieb James Westby:
> > > > There seem to be some false positives in here, for instance #183615.
> > > > Is this a bug in the launchpad bug search that you use do you think?
> > >
> > > Seems that http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11413037/foo.txt on
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/183615 had
> > > the 'patch tag' on, I'm sure that others do too.
> > >
> > > Martin: is this a bug in the apport bug filing?
> >
> > No, it's not. This foo.txt attachment is not filed by apport. I guess
> > the person who attached it just accidentally enabled the patch checkbox.
>
> I've seen quite a lot of this around. I think that many people who add
> attachments don't know what a patch is, and see no harm in checking the box.

Perhaps turning it into a query-by-mimetype feature would be better?

I figure that any *properly* generated patch ought to be
mimetype-detectable anyway, and doing so would make user error not such
an issue.

It would also allow the searcher a finer grain control over what they're
looking for. Perhaps this could be made to distinguish debdiffs from
regular patches, which some might find helpful. It could also help for
searching on things besides patches - for instance searching for
screenshots (*.png) or example files (*.svg, *.pdf, *.odt, etc.) and so
on.

Bryce




--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org