On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:17:28PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:34:00AM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:14:13PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > This looks like good work on the most important part of this spec;
> > > thanks! I'd like to make the proposed apt-setup changes, but it looks
> > > like the request for a command-line option to expose the correct
> > > filenames is still outstanding. Is that still on your list?
> > Thanks for the review. Is the current "apt-get update --print-uris"
> > sufficient? It displays both URL and path. There is currently a bug
> > in the output and it does not display the "Release" file when run with
> > --print-utis. This is fixed in my bzr tree and will be part of the
> > next upload.
> Ah, yes. If you can promise that the output format won't change without
> due notice, then I can start using that as soon as it displays the
> Release file.
With the latest apt upload 0.7.9ubuntu6 the bug should be fixed. The
format of --print-uris should be pretty stable and I have no intention
to break it
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel