Lucid auto-syncing with Debian testing
~motu-sru has no objections to this for a SRU
On Nov 2, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Michael Bienia wrote:
>> On 2009-11-02 08:54:24 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> It sounds like we are past the Rubicon, so we ought to focus on
>>> documentation and updating needed tools. In addition to MoM (as I
>>> above) and requestsync, that others have mentioned, I'm pretty
>>> sure there
>>> are others. The u-u-d-t pull-debian-source script is one that
>>> comes to
>> I've changed the defaults for requestsync and pull-debian-source in
>> ubuntu-dev-tools bzr.
>> But I'm not sure yet if and how to update ubuntu-dev-tools in
>> karmic: is
>> a backport enough (once the changes got uploaded to lucid) or better
>> prepare a SRU so it reaches far more developers and contributors?
> Unless motu-sru object, I think this is appropriate for an SRU.
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel