strawpoll: should apport-collect add a comment or change description?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:42:26PM -0700, Mike Rooney wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Martin Pitt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > apport-collect was introduced some weeks ago  to help bug triagers
> > and reporters with data collection.
> > Right now it adds the "short text" part of the data to a new comment.
> > It has been suggested to append them to the description instead,
> > similar to bugs which were originally filed with apport.
> > Would you prefer keeping the current "new comment" approach, which
> > results in cleaner bug emails but harder to find bug comments on the
> > web UI, or apport-collect modifying the description, which results in
> > harder to read bug mail, but cleaner web UI presentation?
> Is there anything wrong with doing both? It would make the bug mail
> slightly more verbose (but hopefully not increase the number) and
> potentially give the best of both worlds. Then perhaps one can be
> simplified since the other exists.
I agree that performing both actions is the ideal situation. If that
is objectionable I'd prefer the description were updated as it can be
harder to find a specific comment especially if the comment number is
higher than 80.
Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
|All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16 AM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.