FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 12-26-2008, 04:22 PM
Scott Kitterman
 
Default Code merge notifications too much was: lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu into lp:~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu

From: John Vivirito <gnomefreak@gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <ubuntu@kitterman.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:57:32 -0000
Subj: Re: [Merge] lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu into
lp:~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu

>On 12/25/2008 12:39 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 06:18:39AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
>>> On 12/23/2008 06:44 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>>> Review: Disapprove
>>>> no idea why you ask for approval to merge something in your own branch
... most likely a mistake. remember to trash your branch and start from
~ubuntu-dev on next upstream update. Thanks!
>>> I was trying to update my branch from the ~dev branch
>>>
>>
>> just trash it ... pull the ubuntu-dev one and push overwrite it to
>> _your_ branch name.
>>
>> - Alexander
>>
>
>What branches did you add .bzr-builddeb to so i know what ones i need to
>pull and add it.
>
>--
>Sincerely Yours,
> John Vivirito
>
>https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
>Linux User# 414246
>
>"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
> -- Metallica from Unforgiven III
>
>
>https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu/+merge/2503
>Your team Ubuntu Development Team is subscribed to branch
lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu.
>

We need to come up with a different model for this kind of communication. This kind of
conversation should be between the sponsor and the sponsoree. I don't see how ubuntu-dev as
a whole needs this. The volume isn't a lot now, but as bzr branches get
more use, it will grow.

Scott K

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
 
Old 12-26-2008, 04:35 PM
James Westby
 
Default Code merge notifications too much was: lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu into lp:~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu

On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:22 -0600, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> We need to come up with a different model for this kind of communication. This kind of
> conversation should be between the sponsor and the sponsoree. I don't see how ubuntu-dev as
> a whole needs this. The volume isn't a lot now, but as bzr branches get
> more use, it will grow.

Once we have a proper namespace for package branches in launchpad then
we will be able to craft merge proposals such that they become most
useful to us. I imagine that this will mean that for most merge requests
you will only receive an email if you have expressed a preference to
receive it.

The page at

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Requirements/Sponsorship

deals somewhat with how I feel this should work.

This will of course not stop emails being generated if people still use
branches owned by e.g. ~ubuntu-dev. This may be a desirable thing to do,
so we should ensure that launchpad provides a way to allow this without
generating too much email for those that do not want it. This isn't a
problem specific to Ubuntu, but I think it affects us more than most as
teams like ~ubuntu-dev are so large and deal with so much code that it
increases the number of review requests you don't really care about.

Thanks,

James



--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
 
Old 12-26-2008, 04:42 PM
Scott Kitterman
 
Default Code merge notifications too much was: lp:~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu into lp:~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/chatzilla.ubuntu

On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:35:52 +0000 James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net>
wrote:
>On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:22 -0600, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> We need to come up with a different model for this kind of
communication. This kind of
>> conversation should be between the sponsor and the sponsoree. I don't
see how ubuntu-dev as
>> a whole needs this. The volume isn't a lot now, but as bzr branches get
>> more use, it will grow.
>
>Once we have a proper namespace for package branches in launchpad then
>we will be able to craft merge proposals such that they become most
>useful to us. I imagine that this will mean that for most merge requests
>you will only receive an email if you have expressed a preference to
>receive it.
>
>The page at
>
>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Requirements/Sponsorship
>
>deals somewhat with how I feel this should work.
>
>This will of course not stop emails being generated if people still use
>branches owned by e.g. ~ubuntu-dev. This may be a desirable thing to do,
>so we should ensure that launchpad provides a way to allow this without
>generating too much email for those that do not want it. This isn't a
>problem specific to Ubuntu, but I think it affects us more than most as
>teams like ~ubuntu-dev are so large and deal with so much code that it
>increases the number of review requests you don't really care about.
>
Would you consider seeing if there's an existing bug for this or submit a
new one?

My understanding of this is still somewhat limited and I think you're in a
better position to write a thoughtful change request.

Scott K

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Fri Dec 26 20:30:01 2008
Return-path: <bounce-debian-laptop=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:41:57 +0200
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100]:59582)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <bounce-debian-laptop=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>)
id 1LGGhA-00024r-Uc
for tom@linux-archive.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:41:57 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 9DDEA13A5761; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <webmaster@bananas-playground.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=HS_INDEX_PARAM,LDOSUBSCRIBER,
LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.2.3
X-Original-To: lists-debian-laptop@liszt.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-laptop@liszt.debian.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F6413A5079
for <lists-debian-laptop@liszt.debian.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id 32430-58 for <lists-debian-laptop@liszt.debian.org>;
Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight: DYN_NJABL=ERR SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=ERR NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1 <client=85.13.141.75> <helo=dd21306.kasserver.com> <from=webmaster@bananas-playground.net> <to=debian-laptop@lists.debian.org>, rate: -4.6
Received: from dd21306.kasserver.com (dd21306.kasserver.com [85.13.141.75])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E60113A5027
for <debian-laptop@lists.debian.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:42:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.127] (d83-189-83-235.cust.tele2.de [83.189.83.235])
by dd21306.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC5A5A45E0;
Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:42:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <495517A2.80806@bananas-playground.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:42:58 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=2EKe=DFler=22?=
<webmaster@bananas-playground.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: oopla@liszt.debian.org, debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: battery performance lower then..
References: <495401AB.9060107@bananas-playground.net> <20081226142011.GB32684@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20081226142011.GB32684@localhost>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-lt
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=3.6 required=5.3
tests=[HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5]
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <o8GwT_iE87O.A.RT.leRVJB@liszt>
Resent-From: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-laptop@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/33106
X-Loop: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-laptop.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-laptop@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC)

thank you was missing this package.

Paolo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:56:59PM +0100, "J.Ke?ler" wrote:
>> So my question is, what can I do to improve the working time and what
>> can I check if something is not working as it should.
>> eg. if there is some "special-debian-power" package or some general
>> power saving settings which I'm not aware of.
>
> try laptop-mode-tools
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org