-----Message d'origine-----
DeÂ*:
rpm-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:rpm-list-bounces@redhat.com] De la part de Jeff Johnson
EnvoyéÂ*: mardi 8 janvier 2008
15:01
ÀÂ*: RPM Package Manager
ObjetÂ*: Re: Failed
dependencies on /usr
Â*
Â*
On Jan 8, 2008 8:26 AM,
ELASRI Patrice SOFRECOM <patrice.elasri@sofrecom.com>
wrote:
Hi,
I have built a
package located by default under /usr/local.
When I try to install it, I'm returned the following error :
$ rpm -U sof-u-2.1.2-1.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* /usr is needed by
sof-u-2.1.2-1.noarch
If I relocate
the package, I'm returned the following error, with dependencies on original
paths :
$ rpm -U --define
"_autorelocate_path %{nil}" --prefix /usr/local/sofrecom
sof-u-2.1.2-1.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* /usr is needed by
sof-u-2.1.2-1.noarch
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* /usr/local is needed by
sof-u-2.1.2-1.noarch
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* /usr/local/etc is needed by
sof-u-2.1.2-1.noarch
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* ...
Â*
In rpm-4.4.7 and later, every
file depends on its parent directory.
Â*
All of the dependency failures
you are seeing are parent directories
that aren't packaged.
Â*
There is a --noparentdirs that
disables the dependencies on parent
directories.
Â*
Another easy persistent fix for
your specific problem(s) is
Â*Â* Â*mkdir -p
/etc/rpm/sysinfo
Â*Â* Â*echo
"/usr" >> /etc/rpm/sysinfoDirnames
Â*Â* Â*echo
"/usr/local" >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Dirnames
Â*Â* Â*echo
"/usr/local/etc" >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Dirnames
Â*Â* Â*...
Â*
Thanks for these
information. Is there a document which talks about it ?
I tried the –noparentdirs option and it works fine.
Â*
There
is also ( in 4.4.7+?, I fergit) a --orphandirsÂ*popt
alias that will
display all directories
that are not packaged:
Â*Â* Â*rpm
-Va --nofiles --orphandirs
that should generate a
sort'd uniq'd list of directories that are not packaged.
The _autorelocate_path macro
setting is necessary. Otherwise, the package is installed under /emul/noarch-hpux11.23 !!!
I'm using rpm
4.4.7 which I have built on HPUX 11.23 / ia64. The RPM database was initialised
with a pseudo package providing usual interpreters ( /bin/sh, /bin/ksh,
/bin/perl, … ).
Â*
Ah ia64 multilib.
Â*
Expect some
problems is all that I can say. The implementation of multilib on ia64
in rpm was done in like 8
hours on a borrowed ia64 developer's box and has never been
properly QA'd to my
knowledge.
Â*
I’m not so aware
about the rpm developmentsÂ*; I’m just an rpm user. What do you means
by multilib ?
About the _autorelocate_path
macro setting, I noticed that this one is mandatory when the –prefix option is used, what ever the
package architecture. Otherwise, the package is installed under /emul/noarch-hpux11.23, or even under /emul/ia64-hpux11.23 for the architecture
dependents packages built on ia64.
Â*
SELinux, in
particular, is likely to be extremely weird on a multilib/ia64 box
because of the
/emul/noarch-hpux11.23 prefix breaking the lookup of
file contexts from
SELinux configuration.
Â*
I'll be happy to help you
sort out any/all multilib/ia64.
Â*
Likely <rpm-devel@rpm5.org>Â*is a better
place to report issues, as only the few & the brave are
attemptingÂ*HP-UX multilib/ia64 relocated installs with rpm-4.4.7+.
Â*
If you are interested on,
I can report you what I did for building and installing RPM on HP-UX.
Â*
73 de Jeff
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
Failed dependencies on /usr
