Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
I've run into an installation order issue related to the "post"
scriptlet in one of my packages. Basically, this scripts executes a (command-line only) program installed by the package, and this program pretty much needs everything required by the package. The problem is, if I install my package along with some of the required software, the requirements are often installed *after* the "main" package - which means the "post" script won't work because some of what the program needs isn't installed yet. So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", isn't it? But how do I set it up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and most of the entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" mechanism, so duplicating the info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. Is there an alternative? Can I somehow say that everything in the main Requires list is also required by "post"? Or alternatively, can I enable automatic search for shared objects etc. for Requires(post) just like for Requires? - Toralf _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
--- On Thu, 9/11/08, Toralf Lund <toralf@procaptura.com> wrote:
> From: Toralf Lund <toralf@procaptura.com> > Subject: Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm > To: "RPM Mailing List" <rpm-list@redhat.com> > Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 12:15 PM > I've run into an installation order issue related to the > "post" > scriptlet in one of my packages. Basically, this scripts > executes a > (command-line only) program installed by the package, and > this program > pretty much needs everything required by the package. The > problem is, if > I install my package along with some of the required > software, the > requirements are often installed *after* the > "main" package - which > means the "post" script won't work because > some of what the program > needs isn't installed yet. > > So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", > isn't it? But how do I set it to keep Requires and Requires(post) in sync you > up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and > most of the > entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" > mechanism, so duplicating the > info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. > Is there an > alternative? Can I somehow say that everything in the main > Requires list > is also required by "post"? Or alternatively, can > I enable automatic > search for shared objects etc. for Requires(post) just like > for Requires? To keep Requires and Requires(post) in sync you can use rpmrebuild (http://rpmrebuild.sf.net) First you build your package as usual. Then you use rpmrebuild to rebuild package. You'll need to write plugin for --change-spec-requires. It's can be something like sed -n -e 'p' -e 's/^Requires:/Requires(post):/p' Valery > > - Toralf > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-list mailing list > Rpm-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
Valery Reznic wrote:
--- On Thu, 9/11/08, Toralf Lund <toralf@procaptura.com> wrote: From: Toralf Lund <toralf@procaptura.com> Subject: Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm To: "RPM Mailing List" <rpm-list@redhat.com> Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 12:15 PM I've run into an installation order issue related to the "post" [ ... ] So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", isn't it? But how do I set it up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and most of the entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" mechanism, so duplicating the info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. [ ... ] To keep Requires and Requires(post) in sync you can use rpmrebuild (http://rpmrebuild.sf.net) First you build your package as usual. Then you use rpmrebuild to rebuild package. You'll need to write plugin for --change-spec-requires. It's can be something like Right. I never thought of that. This does seems like a rather roundabout way of going about it, though, and I was really hoping for some sort of support within rpmbuild itself. Thanks anyway... - Toralf sed -n -e 'p' -e 's/^Requires:/Requires(post):/p' Valery - Toralf _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list -- Toralf Lund <toralf@procaptura.com> +47 66 85 51 22 ProCaptura AS +47 66 85 51 00 (switchboard) http://www.procaptura.com/ +47 66 85 51 01 (fax) _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
Toralf Lund wrote:
Valery Reznic wrote: [ ... ] So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", isn't it? But how do I set it up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and most of the entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" mechanism, so duplicating the info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. [ ... ] To keep Requires and Requires(post) in sync you can use rpmrebuild (http://rpmrebuild.sf.net) First you build your package as usual. Then you use rpmrebuild to rebuild package. You'll need to write plugin for --change-spec-requires. It's can be something like Right. I never thought of that. This does seems like a rather roundabout way of going about it, though, and I was really hoping for some sort of support within rpmbuild itself. But actually, I can't seem to reproduce the original problem now, i.e. when I retry the installation, the packages are installed in the "correct" order without Requires(pre). And many this is what I should expect; rpm does try to order packages according to (normal) Requires these days, doesn't it. Yet I'm quite sure that it somehow decided to install the package using certain libs after the ones providing them when I tested this earlier. I'm confused ;-( - Toralf _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
Toralf Lund wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote: Valery Reznic wrote: [ ... ] So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", isn't it? But how do I set it up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and most of the entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" mechanism, so duplicating the info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. [ ... ] To keep Requires and Requires(post) in sync you can use rpmrebuild (http://rpmrebuild.sf.net) First you build your package as usual. Then you use rpmrebuild to rebuild package. You'll need to write plugin for --change-spec-requires. It's can be something like Right. I never thought of that. This does seems like a rather roundabout way of going about it, though, and I was really hoping for some sort of support within rpmbuild itself. But actually, I can't seem to reproduce the original problem now, i.e. when I retry the installation, the packages are installed in the "correct" order without Requires(pre). And many this is what I should expect; rpm does try to order packages according to (normal) Requires these days, doesn't it. Yet I'm quite sure that it somehow decided to install the package using certain libs after the ones providing them when I tested this earlier. I'm confused ;-( ... confused enough to get the above bit the wrong way around. What I meant to say, was that a package requiring some libs was somewhat unexpectedly installed first of all even though rpms providing the libs were specified on the same command line. - Toralf _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
Toralf Lund wrote:
I've run into an installation order issue related to the "post" scriptlet in one of my packages. Basically, this scripts executes a (command-line only) program installed by the package, and this program pretty much needs everything required by the package. The problem is, if I install my package along with some of the required software, the requirements are often installed *after* the "main" package - which means the "post" script won't work because some of what the program needs isn't installed yet. So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", isn't it? But how do I set it up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and most of the entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" mechanism, so duplicating the info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. Is there an alternative? Can I somehow say that everything in the main Requires list is also required by "post"? Or alternatively, can I enable automatic search for shared objects etc. for Requires(post) just like for Requires? Perhaps my understanding is wrong - but I believe: Requires(pre) is when something is required for a pre-install script. Requires(post) is when something is required for a post-install script but not necessarily for the package itself - IE you could remove the dependency after the post script has run. When installing a group of RPMs together, the post scripts are not run until after all the packages are installed - so if foo requires bar and the foo post script needs bar installed - just Requires: bar should ensure that bar is actually installed before the foo post scriptlet runs. My understanding of this may not be 100% _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
On Sep 15, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote: I've run into an installation order issue related to the "post" scriptlet in one of my packages. Basically, this scripts executes a (command-line only) program installed by the package, and this program pretty much needs everything required by the package. The problem is, if I install my package along with some of the required software, the requirements are often installed *after* the "main" package - which means the "post" script won't work because some of what the program needs isn't installed yet. So, this is when I use "Requires(post)", isn't it? But how do I set it up? The Requires of the package is a very long list, and most of the entries are added via the "AutoReqProv" mechanism, so duplicating the info by hand for "Requires(post)" is rather hard. Is there an alternative? Can I somehow say that everything in the main Requires list is also required by "post"? Or alternatively, can I enable automatic search for shared objects etc. for Requires(post) just like for Requires? Perhaps my understanding is wrong - but I believe: Um, yes, wrong. Requires(pre) is when something is required for a pre-install script. Requires(post) is when something is required for a post-install script but not necessarily for the package itself - IE you could remove the dependency after the post script has run. When installing a group of RPMs together, the post scripts are not run until after all the packages are installed - so if foo requires bar and the foo post script needs bar installed - just Requires: bar should ensure that bar is actually installed before the foo post scriptlet runs. The %pre and %post scripts are run immediately before/after a package is installed, not after all the packages are installed. This is also true for %preun/%postun when a package is erased, the scripts are run immediately before/after the erasure. My understanding of this may not be 100% What is most confusing is that rpm does install before erase. Which means that %post scriptlet is run before %preun is run, which is perhaps counter- intuitive, but is exactly what is needed if shared libraries are being upgraded on live systems. The new librrary must be installed before the old library is removed in ordeer to minimize the window where the library is not available. Another confusion is the relationship on upgrade between the new installed package and the older erased package(s) (note that Obsoletes: can/will lead to multiple packages to be erased). rpm has never guaranteed any relation between installed <-> erased package ordering other than "Erasing is after install." As originally implemented, erasing was immediately after install. Nothing wrong with that except that forces the erasure to happen before the next install is attempted, whgich is slower than delaying all erasures until later, as erasures can always be run in parallel (assuming that erasure dependencies are accurate and that erasures are well ordered, but even those details usually don't matter on upgrade). And finally that brings the topic to context markers like Requires(post) etc. Context markers like Requires(post) are intended to break dependency loops while ordering. A package that "needs" some other package solely while running a %post scriptlet, not after being installed, can carry a Requires(post) hint to the ordering within rpm. The hint excludes dependency loops between install <=> erase packages. The other major affect of adding an explicit Requires(post) hint is that those dependencies are not registered in an rpmdb because they were needed solely for installing, not for using or erasing, a package. There's no need to keep track of the install context dependencies after the install has been done because the %post scriptlet is run only during install, never run after install. hth 73 de jeff _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: Toralf Lund wrote: I've run into an installation order issue related to the "post" scriptlet in one of my packages. Basically, this scripts executes a (command-line only) program installed by the package, and this program pretty much needs everything required by the package. The problem is, if I install my package along with some of the required software, the requirements are often installed *after* the "main" package [ ... ] Perhaps my understanding is wrong - but I believe: Um, yes, wrong. [ .. ] The %pre and %post scripts are run immediately before/after a package is installed, not after all the packages are installed. Exactly. This is what's causing me trouble; essentially, I have a command that would be better to run at the end of the entire transaction. But I think I understand why rpm doesn't work that way... This is also true for %preun/%postun when a package is erased, the scripts are run immediately before/after the erasure. My understanding of this may not be 100% What is most confusing is that rpm does install before erase. Which means that %post scriptlet is run before %preun is run, which is perhaps counter-intuitive, but is exactly what is needed if shared libraries are being upgraded on live systems. The new librrary must be installed before the old library is removed in ordeer to minimize the window where the library is not available. Quite. [ ... ] And finally that brings the topic to context markers like Requires(post) etc. Context markers like Requires(post) are intended to break dependency loops while ordering. A package that "needs" some other package solely while running a %post scriptlet, not after being installed, can carry a Requires(post) hint to the ordering within rpm. In my case the script and the package itself both need (more or less) the same libs. Logically, they may be seen as independent sets of dependencies, though, I think... The hint excludes dependency loops between install <=> erase packages. The other major affect of adding an explicit Requires(post) hint is that those dependencies are not registered in an rpmdb because they were needed solely for installing, not for using or erasing, a package. There's no need to keep track of the install context dependencies after the install has been done because the %post scriptlet is run only during install, never run after install. hth Well. It doesn't help me too much with my original issue. But, like I said elsewhere, I can't seem to reproduce the problem I thought I had, so maybe it doesn't matter. I'm still confused, though. Question: Can I generally assume the packages are ordered according to "Requires" these days, i.e. that if package A requires something provided by package B, then B is installed before A (when A and B are both part of the same transaction)? I'm fairly sure I couldn't when I started using rpm, so I had to mess about with ""PreReq" instead... 73 de jeff _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
Dependency problem when "post" runs command from the rpm
On Sep 21, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: Toralf Lund wrote: I've run into an installation order issue related to the "post" scriptlet in one of my packages. Basically, this scripts executes a (command-line only) program installed by the package, and this program pretty much needs everything required by the package. The problem is, if I install my package along with some of the required software, the requirements are often installed *after* the "main" package [ ... ] Perhaps my understanding is wrong - but I believe: Um, yes, wrong. [ .. ] The %pre and %post scripts are run immediately before/after a package is installed, not after all the packages are installed. Exactly. This is what's causing me trouble; essentially, I have a command that would be better to run at the end of the entire transaction. But I think I understand why rpm doesn't work that way... There are %posttrans scriptlets that run at the end of the transaction. This is also true for %preun/%postun when a package is erased, the scripts are run immediately before/after the erasure. My understanding of this may not be 100% What is most confusing is that rpm does install before erase. Which means that %post scriptlet is run before %preun is run, which is perhaps counter-intuitive, but is exactly what is needed if shared libraries are being upgraded on live systems. The new librrary must be installed before the old library is removed in ordeer to minimize the window where the library is not available. Quite. [ ... ] And finally that brings the topic to context markers like Requires(post) etc. Context markers like Requires(post) are intended to break dependency loops while ordering. A package that "needs" some other package solely while running a %post scriptlet, not after being installed, can carry a Requires(post) hint to the ordering within rpm. In my case the script and the package itself both need (more or less) the same libs. Logically, they may be seen as independent sets of dependencies, though, I think... The hint excludes dependency loops between install <=> erase packages. The other major affect of adding an explicit Requires(post) hint is that those dependencies are not registered in an rpmdb because they were needed solely for installing, not for using or erasing, a package. There's no need to keep track of the install context dependencies after the install has been done because the %post scriptlet is run only during install, never run after install. hth Well. It doesn't help me too much with my original issue. But, like I said elsewhere, I can't seem to reproduce the problem I thought I had, so maybe it doesn't matter. I'm still confused, though. Question: Can I generally assume the packages are ordered according to "Requires" these days, i.e. that if package A requires something provided by package B, then B is installed before A (when A and B are both part of the same transaction)? I'm fairly sure I couldn't when I started using rpm, so I had to mess about with ""PreReq" instead... Yes, except for dependency loops, where all dependencies involvedin the loop are ignored for ordering purposes. Requires: == PreReq: for like 8 years now, but I'm sure you can findany answer you wish to hear regarding rpm PreReq: 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.