Linux Archive

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)
-   Red Hat Linux (http://www.linux-archive.org/red-hat-linux/)
-   -   Confused by kill vs. tgkill (http://www.linux-archive.org/red-hat-linux/690405-confused-kill-vs-tgkill.html)

redhatter 08-03-2012 06:35 PM

Confused by kill vs. tgkill
 
A little question on the usage of kill(2) I have run into:

I have scripts that check whether a process is alive by getting a known pidfile,
then issuing a "kill -o PID" to the PID contained in that pidfile.

However, it seems that nowadays "kill -o PID" also sends signals to threads, i.e.
if there is no PID, the value is assumed to be a TID and the thread is signalled
(or maybe the process to which the TID belongs, not sure)

This makes it rather more likely that a process PID is found to be erroneously alive
as a thread may have taken its (now defunct) PID.

There are ways around that, but now for the specification. Consider /bin/kill:

- An strace of /bin/kill shows a call to "kill" but:
- The kill(2) manpage doesn't mention threads at all.
- There is a specially designed tgkill(2) to signal threads.
- The manpage of tgkill says; "By contrast, kill(2) can only be used to send a
signal to a process (i.e., thread group) as a whole, and the signal will be
delivered to an arbitrary thread within that process.)"

So either the kill(2) manpage and the tgkill(2) are wrong / need to be
completed or there is an implementation problem with the kill syscall.

Any thoughts on this? Should I open a bug to complete the manpage??

Best regards,

-- David Tonhofer


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:12 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.