On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:17:02PM -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> So! I made a Feature-styled wiki pagelet to keep track of the plans for
> the treebuilder branch of lorax:
Cool, I'll add livecd notes to this when I have the chance. And I still
need to post my patches.
> a) rush treebuilder for F16,
If it were ready, I'd say go for it...
> b) keep lorax/anaconda images as-is for F16, even though we'll be
> changing it again in F17, or
> c) revert the squashfs stuff in f16-branch and build f15-style images
> again for F16?
If this makes the transition to treebuilder for F17 easier this is what
I'd do. Assuming it doesn't mess up F16 Beta.
Given where we're at in the F16 process I think we need to make sure we
don't break stuff
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list