FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Red Hat Linux

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-14-2011, 01:53 AM
Karthikeyan J
 
Default Best way to automatically copy out attachments from an email (Matty Sarro)

Hi Matty

Where is the data and logs copied to , Is it to a windows machine ?


Regards
Karthik

--- On Thu, 1/13/11, redhat-list-request@redhat.com <redhat-list-request@redhat.com> wrote:

From: redhat-list-request@redhat.com <redhat-list-request@redhat.com>
Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 83, Issue 11
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Date: Thursday, January 13, 2011, 10:30 PM

Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
*** redhat-list@redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
*** https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
*** redhat-list-request@redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
*** redhat-list-owner@redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

***1. Best way to automatically copy out attachments from an email
* * * (Matty Sarro)
***2. Re: Best way to automatically copy out attachments from an
* * * email (m.roth@5-cent.us)
***3. what is "session required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so "
* * * in*** /etc/pam.d/system-auth (Eduardo Herrera Leiva)
***4. Re: what is "session required
* * * /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so " in*** /etc/pam.d/system-auth (Munish)
***5. RE: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5 (Mertens, Bram)
***6. Re: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5 (ESGLinux)
***7. RE: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5 (Mertens, Bram)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:59:05 -0500
From: Matty Sarro <msarro@gmail.com>
To: Python list <python-list@python.org>,*** General Red Hat Linux
*** discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Best way to automatically copy out attachments from an email
Message-ID:
*** <AANLkTi=mOcm3RRrp0-OYrjWAhqctbufvcVTYTJ2BrpoK@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

As of now here is my situation:
I am working on a system to aggregate IT data and logs. A number of
important data are gathered by a third party system. The only
immediate way I have to access the data is to have their system
automatically email me updates in CSV format every hour. If I set up a
mail client on the server, this shouldn't be a huge issue.

However, is there a way to automatically open the emails, and copy the
attachments to a directory based on the filename? Kind of a weird
project, I know. Just looking for some ideas hence posting this on two
lists.

Thanks all, and happy hump day!
-Matty



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:16:08 -0500
From: m.roth@5-cent.us
To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Best way to automatically copy out attachments from an
*** email
Message-ID:
*** <3c9ecef22e75e1319000517671cc9fa7.squirrel@host290 .hostmonster.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

Matty Sarro wrote:
> As of now here is my situation:
> I am working on a system to aggregate IT data and logs. A number of
> important data are gathered by a third party system. The only
> immediate way I have to access the data is to have their system
> automatically email me updates in CSV format every hour. If I set up a
> mail client on the server, this shouldn't be a huge issue.
>
> However, is there a way to automatically open the emails, and copy the
> attachments to a directory based on the filename? Kind of a weird
> project, I know. Just looking for some ideas hence posting this on two
> lists.

Well, they are presumably in std. MIME format, so you can strip it off,
maybe with a filter either in your mail tool, or in the delivery system.
procmail comes to mind.

* * * * * mark



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:18:10 -0300
From: Eduardo Herrera Leiva <edoherrera@uc.cl>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: what is "session required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so "
*** in*** /etc/pam.d/system-auth
Message-ID: <4D2DFE72.3030904@uc.cl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed

Hi

* I have install RedHat Directory Server, the install guide require add
the next line in /etc/pam.d/system-auth

session required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so

Which mean the line "lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so" and make in the
system.


Thanks

--
_____________________________________
Eduardo A. Herrera Leiva
Administrador de Sistemas
SubDirecci?n de Operaci?n y Plataforma
Direcci?n de Inform?tica
Pontificia Universidad Cat?lica de Chile
Tel?fono: 56 2 354 1369



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:27:49 +0800
From: Munish <munishdh@yahoo.com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: what is "session required
*** /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so " in*** /etc/pam.d/system-auth
Message-ID: <1BF60604-0CE9-4F26-9659-233D238DB38D@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;*** charset=utf-8

This is the file used by unix/Linux for login authentication. The order of lines are important in this file as PAM reads it from top to bottom.

Cheers!!!
Munish
Sent from my iPhone4


On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Eduardo Herrera Leiva <edoherrera@uc.cl> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have install RedHat Directory Server, the install guide require add the next line in /etc/pam.d/system-auth
>
> session required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so
>
> Which mean the line "lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so" and make in the system.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> _____________________________________
> Eduardo A. Herrera Leiva
> Administrador de Sistemas
> SubDirecci?n de Operaci?n y Plataforma
> Direcci?n de Inform?tica
> Pontificia Universidad Cat?lica de Chile
> Tel?fono: 56 2 354 1369
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:32:12 +0100
From: "Mertens, Bram" <mertensb@mazdaeur.com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
Message-ID:
*** <1EF123869BB2CC4EAC0A1AA45CFFC2FA02548AE3A4@DEFRWP MB001.ad.fdc.mazdaeur.com>
***
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

What about http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/ ?* Straight from the horse's mouth.

I attended a seminar on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 6 last Tuesday and most attention was devoted to improvements in the area of virtualization and the significantly improved scalability.

So if you need more RAM, more CPU or bigger file systems RHEL6 is what you need.

If some of your virtualized servers could benefit from increased IO and such RHEL6 promises big improvements.

You may also want to contact your sales rep to see if a similar seminar is being held near you.

Other major change is the training offer and the changes in certification.

Finally the change in lifecycle might be interesting, but then again if you want and are able to keep up with new development being able to run RHEL6 for the next 10 years might not be important to you.

Regards

Bram

>


Mazda Motor Logistics Europe NV, Blaasveldstraat 162, B-2830 Willebroek
VAT BE 0406.024.281, RPR Mechelen, ING* 310-0092504-52, IBAN : BE64 3100 0925 0452, SWIFT : BBRUBEBB

-----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of ESGLinux
> Sent: woensdag 12 januari 2011 12:17
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
>
> Hi all,
>
> I?m looking for a good doc/presentation/video that shows the changes
> made in
> RHEL6 comparing it with RHEL5.
>
> I need it to convince my boss to update to RHEL 6 some non critical
> servers
> to test it on a non critical (but real) enviroment.
>
> any help?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> ESG
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:32:19 +0100
From: ESGLinux <esggrupos@gmail.com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
Message-ID:
*** <AANLkTinhy==BhCRgU60heABijmxuFNAQB61wCp5dZpiF@mai l.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Thank you for your help

This page is my main reference but I was looking for something a title
diferent, like a table with the comparative.

In the link that Paul suggested you can see, for example:

Ram RHEL5 - 1TB
Ram RHEL6 - 16 TB.

something like that.

After reading some articles I think the big effort RH has made with RHEL6 is
scalabilty.

Virtualization is good, but with RHEL 5.5 I can use kvm and I think is
enough for me (at this moment, of course)

Any other point to take in account?

Thanks again,

ESG


2011/1/13 Mertens, Bram <mertensb@mazdaeur.com>

> What about http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/ ?* Straight from the
> horse's mouth.
>
> I attended a seminar on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 6 last Tuesday and
> most attention was devoted to improvements in the area of virtualization and
> the significantly improved scalability.
>
> So if you need more RAM, more CPU or bigger file systems RHEL6 is what you
> need.
>
> If some of your virtualized servers could benefit from increased IO and
> such RHEL6 promises big improvements.
>
> You may also want to contact your sales rep to see if a similar seminar is
> being held near you.
>
> Other major change is the training offer and the changes in certification.
>
> Finally the change in lifecycle might be interesting, but then again if you
> want and are able to keep up with new development being able to run RHEL6
> for the next 10 years might not be important to you.
>
> Regards
>
> Bram
>
> >
>
>
> Mazda Motor Logistics Europe NV, Blaasveldstraat 162, B-2830 Willebroek
> VAT BE 0406.024.281, RPR Mechelen, ING* 310-0092504-52, IBAN : BE64 3100
> 0925 0452, SWIFT : BBRUBEBB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> > From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> > bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of ESGLinux
> > Sent: woensdag 12 januari 2011 12:17
> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> > Subject: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I?m looking for a good doc/presentation/video that shows the changes
> > made in
> > RHEL6 comparing it with RHEL5.
> >
> > I need it to convince my boss to update to RHEL 6 some non critical
> > servers
> > to test it on a non critical (but real) enviroment.
> >
> > any help?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > ESG
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:58:48 +0100
From: "Mertens, Bram" <mertensb@mazdaeur.com>
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
Message-ID:
*** <1EF123869BB2CC4EAC0A1AA45CFFC2FA02548F06D8@DEFRWP MB001.ad.fdc.mazdaeur.com>
***
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Well, one thing I am eager to start testing is the improvements for IO on virtualized servers.* In a webcast I attended a while ago Red Hat promised great improvements for DB2 on a virtual RHEL6 due to improvements with Direct I/O with SR-IOV.

Perhaps http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/tburke_rhel6_full_webinar_loopback.pdf can be of use.

Regards

Bram

>


Mazda Motor Logistics Europe NV, Blaasveldstraat 162, B-2830 Willebroek
VAT BE 0406.024.281, RPR Mechelen, ING* 310-0092504-52, IBAN : BE64 3100 0925 0452, SWIFT : BBRUBEBB

-----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of ESGLinux
> Sent: donderdag 13 januari 2011 11:32
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your help
>
> This page is my main reference but I was looking for something a title
> diferent, like a table with the comparative.
>
> In the link that Paul suggested you can see, for example:
>
> Ram RHEL5 - 1TB
> Ram RHEL6 - 16 TB.
>
> something like that.
>
> After reading some articles I think the big effort RH has made with
> RHEL6 is
> scalabilty.
>
> Virtualization is good, but with RHEL 5.5 I can use kvm and I think is
> enough for me (at this moment, of course)
>
> Any other point to take in account?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> ESG
>
>
> 2011/1/13 Mertens, Bram <mertensb@mazdaeur.com>
>
> > What about http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/ ?* Straight
> from the
> > horse's mouth.
> >
> > I attended a seminar on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 6 last
> Tuesday and
> > most attention was devoted to improvements in the area of
> virtualization and
> > the significantly improved scalability.
> >
> > So if you need more RAM, more CPU or bigger file systems RHEL6 is
> what you
> > need.
> >
> > If some of your virtualized servers could benefit from increased IO
> and
> > such RHEL6 promises big improvements.
> >
> > You may also want to contact your sales rep to see if a similar
> seminar is
> > being held near you.
> >
> > Other major change is the training offer and the changes in
> certification.
> >
> > Finally the change in lifecycle might be interesting, but then again
> if you
> > want and are able to keep up with new development being able to run
> RHEL6
> > for the next 10 years might not be important to you.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bram
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Mazda Motor Logistics Europe NV, Blaasveldstraat 162, B-2830
> Willebroek
> > VAT BE 0406.024.281, RPR Mechelen, ING* 310-0092504-52, IBAN : BE64
> 3100
> > 0925 0452, SWIFT : BBRUBEBB
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: redhat-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-
> > > bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of ESGLinux
> > > Sent: woensdag 12 januari 2011 12:17
> > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> > > Subject: changes in RHEL6 vs RHEL5
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I?m looking for a good doc/presentation/video that shows the
> changes
> > > made in
> > > RHEL6 comparing it with RHEL5.
> > >
> > > I need it to convince my boss to update to RHEL 6 some non critical
> > > servers
> > > to test it on a non critical (but real) enviroment.
> > >
> > > any help?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > ESG
> > > --
> > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-
> request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



------------------------------

__
redhat-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 83, Issue 11
*******************************************




--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org