I *still* got both selinux-policy and selinux-policy-targeted
installed, even though they are explicitly excluded. There
were also some 146 other packages... (is this truly minimal??)
I had this working with anaconda-11.4.0.21. I'm now running 11.4.0.28.
I can't see anything that changed in the sources to account for this.
Gary Thomas wrote:
I'm am trying to build the most minimal system possible.
My first attempt (via kickstart) lists these packages:
Despite this, I *still* end up with selinux-policy and
selinux-policy-targeted installed. Why? Nothing that
was installed requires them, so how/why did they end up
in the list of packages?
Just thinking out loud. Could there be a requirement path from kernel to selinux? It could be whats happening here?
Regards
--
Joel Andres Granados
Red Hat / Brno, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 01:55 PM
Chris Lumens
Minimal systems
> Just thinking out loud. Could there be a requirement path from kernel to selinux? It could be whats happening here?
Yes, that's exactly what's going on here. Something in @base has a
requirement on an selinux package, and those requirements get pulled in
regardless of what is removed in the kickstart %packages section since
dependency resolution happens after the packages section is read.
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:03 PM
Jesse Keating
Minimal systems
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:55:00 -0500
Chris Lumens <clumens@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly what's going on here. Something in @base has a
> requirement on an selinux package, and those requirements get pulled
> in regardless of what is removed in the kickstart %packages section
> since dependency resolution happens after the packages section is
> read.
Except that he used --nobase, so its one of the packages that anaconda
forces in, like from @core.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:08 PM
Gary Thomas
Minimal systems
Chris Lumens wrote:
Just thinking out loud. Could there be a requirement path from kernel to selinux? It could be whats happening here?
Yes, that's exactly what's going on here. Something in @base has a
requirement on an selinux package, and those requirements get pulled in
regardless of what is removed in the kickstart %packages section since
Sorry, I don't buy it. From a fully loaded Fedora 8 system:
# rpm -q --whatrequires selinux-policy
no package requires selinux-policy
# rpm -q --whatrequires selinux-policy-targeted
no package requires selinux-policy-targeted
Also, I used pungi to rebuild my base repository (the one I was
testing with was created by hand) and there's no selinux-*
packages anywhere. Installing from this repository works just
fine.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:08 PM
Bill Nottingham
Minimal systems
Jesse Keating (jkeating@redhat.com) said:
> Except that he used --nobase, so its one of the packages that anaconda
> forces in, like from @core.
policy is explicitly listed in Core.
Bill
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:08 PM
Chris Lumens
Minimal systems
> Except that he used --nobase, so its one of the packages that anaconda
> forces in, like from @core.
Base, Core, whichever. I knew what I meant.
- Chris
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:20 PM
Jesse Keating
Minimal systems
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:21:45 -0700
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
> Which, I guess, is *always* included, specified or not?
>
> Any harm in removing this from the 'comps' file? I have no
> use nor desire ever for selinux on this platform.
Go for it, that's what respinning your own is all about.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:21 PM
Jesse Keating
Minimal systems
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:21:45 -0700
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
> Which, I guess, is *always* included, specified or not?
>
> Any harm in removing this from the 'comps' file? I have no
> use nor desire ever for selinux on this platform.
Rather, remove it from /your/ comps file, not the upstream one in
Fedora CVS (:
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:21 PM
Gary Thomas
Minimal systems
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jesse Keating (jkeating@redhat.com) said:
Except that he used --nobase, so its one of the packages that anaconda
forces in, like from @core.
policy is explicitly listed in Core.
Which, I guess, is *always* included, specified or not?
Any harm in removing this from the 'comps' file? I have no
use nor desire ever for selinux on this platform.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
02-01-2008, 02:26 PM
Gary Thomas
Minimal systems
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:21:45 -0700
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
Which, I guess, is *always* included, specified or not?
Any harm in removing this from the 'comps' file? I have no
use nor desire ever for selinux on this platform.
Rather, remove it from /your/ comps file, not the upstream one in
Fedora CVS (:
No worries - I don't have Fedora CVS access :-)
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
Minimal systems
