søndag den 1. Februar 2009 kvad Derek Broughton:
> Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> > We're drifting...
> How so? We' re still discussing exactly what was asked in the
> original post.
Sorry - my bad
> > lørdag den 31. Januar 2009 kvad Derek Broughton:
> >> >> If you want to search on an entire filesystem there's kfind
> >> >> as Jonas and Johnny suggest
> >> >
> >> > In KDE3 kfind can also search whatever folder one specify, as
> >> > well as exclude or include sub folders beneath said folde,
> >> > whatever the user likes.
> >> Sure - it just doesn't seem that important to use it if all you
> >> want is to look at the contents of your home directory.
> > While it may not be important to me or you, it may be important
> > to the OP.
> > I just answer the OP's question as best I can.
> As did I - he said he wanted to search his home directory, so kfind
> is overkill for that.
I will leave it up to the OP to figure out if kfind is overkill for
As far as I know neither Konqueror nor Dolphin has any means of
limiting the listed files to 100.
While kfind doesn't have a file number limit as such, one can make an
approximate limit through playing with the modification time limits.
Now the OP knows that there is an existing gui application he can try
out, to see if it's good enough for him
Well, at least in KDE3. I don't know if kfind is in KDE4.
> >> >> (though [kfind] isn't on _my_ KDE 4.1 menu, Johnny)
> >> >
> >> > I don't know about KDE4. That's why I specifically wrote KDE3
> >> > in my previous answer.
> >> Ah... I mistook your comment as applying to specific versions,
> >> rather than Kubuntu vs "standard" KDE (is there really such a
> >> thing?)
> > I would say that the KDE source package that is released from the
> > KDE project, is considered "the standard KDE package", i.e.
> > "vanilla KDE".
> > I'm sure you know that different distributions then make more or
> > less changes to KDE when they integrate KDE into their particular
> > flavour of a distribution.
> Well, afaik they _all_ make changes, so I'm not sure anybody really
> runs a vanilla KDE.
I'm sorry, I was a bit short in my info.
I should also have said that the person who helped the new user, was
in the "I roll 'em mysef" league.
So while the KDE3 that came with the new user's distribution was
probably more or less different from vanilla KDE3, the helper's KDE3
was vanilla, and that was his foundation of help to give.
The point of all this is, that my understanding, based on the help
given back then, is that apparantly back then kfind was part of
vanilla KDE3, and it was in the K menu.
This is not my own personal experience, since I have never rolled KDE
myself. I just remember what others have once stated.
Sorry again for the missing info.
> > I simply recall a message on a list like this, helping a new user
> > finding "the search application" in the menu of "vanilla KDE3",
> > in the process telling that it was called kfind.
> Well, it's definitely worthwhile to mention that - I've been using
> KDE for over 10 years, and until 4.1, and no embedded kfind in
> konqueror, I had never actually known that kfind was a separate
> application. The embedded kfind may well be the thing I miss most.
I'm sorry, I was talking about an entry in the K menu - not in
> > What KDE4 is like I have no idea, since I haven't used it yet.
> > (Plan to, though, when kubuntu 9.4 comes out
> And if you have managed not to switch yet, there's no good reason
> to until 9.04! I like what's there in 4.1, but it's just a crying
> shame that there isn't _enough_ in 4.1!
Which is why I have stayed with kubuntu 7.10 and KDE3 so far.
But I really do appreciate all the early adopters.
They are the ones who have filed bug reports to push KDE4 to where it
And I really appreciate all the work that the developers have done on
advancing KDE4 and fixing bugs.
KDE4 is for sure travelling in the right direction
kubuntu-users mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-users