>>----Messaggio originale----
>>Da: macoafi@gmail.com
>>Data: 12/04/2011 20.03
>>A: "LucaTringali"<TRINGALINVENT@libero.it>, "Kubuntu Developer
>> Discussion"
> <kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com>
>>Ogg: Re: ubuntuone
>>
>>On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, LucaTringali <TRINGALINVENT@libero.it>
> wrote:
>>> Hello everybody,
>>> I just wanted to know what's the status of ubuntuone-kde client... I
>>> wasn't
>>> able to find a working version: no deb packages, no sources. How is its
>>> development going?
>>
>>Don't believe anyone's picked it back up since GSoC ended last year.
>>Do you want to?
>>
> I could try to make it work, but I have not too much time, so I may need
> some
> months to release something usable.
>
No one else is working on it at all as far as I know, so even if you can
only make slow progress, that would be considerable improvement over where
we are now.
Scott K
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, LucaTringali<TRINGALINVENT@libero.it>
wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just wanted to know what's the status of ubuntuone-kde client... I
wasn't
able to find a working version: no deb packages, no sources. How is its
development going?
Don't believe anyone's picked it back up since GSoC ended last year.
Do you want to?
I could try to make it work, but I have not too much time, so I may need
some
months to release something usable.
No one else is working on it at all as far as I know, so even if you can
only make slow progress, that would be considerable improvement over where
we are now.
Scott K
I think the biggest issue was, remembering the UDS discussion about this
topic that UbuntuOne was not very cooperative with (pre-)warnings of API
changes. This always puts a potential KDE version in the disadvantage of
being behind the 8-ball.
I am not sure if there is a realistic chance to create a KDE version
under these circumstances, interestingly, the UbuntuOne project within
Canonical does seem to do the same here that Mark is criticising Gnome for.
This is unfortunate, however, I do not see currently a solution for this.
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
04-12-2011, 09:20 PM
Giuseppe Pennisi
R: ubuntuone
2011/4/12 Ralph Janke <txwikinger@ubuntu.com>:
> *On 04/12/2011 03:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ----Messaggio originale----
>>>> Da: macoafi@gmail.com
>>>> Data: 12/04/2011 20.03
>>>> A: "LucaTringali"<TRINGALINVENT@libero.it>, "Kubuntu Developer
>>>> Discussion"
>>>
>>> <kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>>
>>>> Ogg: Re: ubuntuone
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, LucaTringali<TRINGALINVENT@libero.it>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>> I just wanted to know what's the status of ubuntuone-kde client... I
>>>>> wasn't
>>>>> able to find a working version: no deb packages, no sources. How is its
>>>>> development going?
>>>>
>>>> Don't believe anyone's picked it back up since GSoC ended last year.
>>>> Do you want to?
>>>>
>>> I could try to make it work, but I have not too much time, so I may need
>>> some
>>> months to release something usable.
>>>
>> No one else is working on it at all as far as I know, so even if you can
>> only make slow progress, that would be considerable improvement over where
>> we are now.
>>
>> Scott K
>>
> I think the biggest issue was, remembering the UDS discussion about this
> topic that UbuntuOne was not very cooperative with (pre-)warnings of API
> changes. This always puts a potential KDE version in the disadvantage of
> being behind the 8-ball.
>
> I am not sure if there is a realistic chance to create a KDE version under
> these circumstances, interestingly, the UbuntuOne project within Canonical
> does seem to do the same here that Mark is criticising Gnome for.
>
> This is unfortunate, however, I do not see currently a solution for this.
>
Ubuntu ONE or not the question is simple,
Ubuntu is the only Canonical project to make a very useful and lovely
distro for our desktop and all their effort are focused in it.
Kubuntu is only a "hobby" of a pair guys that will never the same
attention as Ubuntu.
The result is that all Canonical projects are only Gnome oriented.
No one o very few (just a pair) Canonical developers will work in the
distro to cure details for improve it. The Kubuntu destiny is only in
the hands of KDE...also for the default settings.
I always thank the Kubuntu developers but I think this is the fact.
Just my two cents,
Giuseppe
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
04-12-2011, 11:58 PM
James Cain
R: ubuntuone
Thank you, Luca. I (and all other Kubuntu faithful) look forward to your efforts! I'm sure you're familiar with Harald Sitter's efforts last year...
http://apachelog.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/ubuntu-one-the-kde-way/
Again, best of luck with this project.
- James
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, LucaTringali <TRINGALINVENT@libero.it> wrote:
Without doing a religion war, I just wanted to say that I'm gonna spend some
time on this project in the future months.
I think we can stop the discussion here, we are going off topic.
R: ubuntuone
