Bug Triage/Update Policy for KDE Guidance
 

Here are my thoughts on the matter. Comments please.

In general, we want to be respectful of the effort people put into
reporting bugs and not have them feel dismissed. At the same time,
kde-guidance is at or close to its end of life. The appropriate action
varies depending on the module:

displayconfig: This code is all dead end. Any bug not meeting SRU criteria
should be politely won't fixed.

Guidance-backends: These bugs should be triaged normally. It's not clear
that the non-KDE user base will all go away.

Power-manager: Already ported and the port is in a new package called
guidance-power-manager. Wishlist bugs should just be changed to this
source package. Since only the U/I code has changed, most bugs will be
valid. Non-SRU bugs should be won't fixed in kde-guidance, added to
guidance-power-manager, and validated/triaged normally against it.

Userconfig/mountconfig: Both need porting, so bugs should be triaged
normally.

Wineconfig/grubconfig: Anyone know the plans for these?

Did I leave anything out?

Scott K

Thought

--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

Bug Triage/Update Policy for KDE Guidance
 

> Wineconfig/grubconfig: Anyone know the plans for these?
>
Wineconfig: will be replaced by a simpler utility (keep forgetting to
hunt down the guy who was going to to the GTK version and backend).
I'll try to fix any bugs in svn, but there's really no point at this
point. Assign any bug reports you run into to me.

grubconfig: kgrubeditor?

~ Yuriy

--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel