hardy *depends* on non-free artwork?
Hi there.
I know vrms is a guide not a definitive tool but would anyone like to take a look at this: #### timmy@freedom-zero:~$ vrms Non-free packages installed on freedom-zero human-icon-theme Human Icon theme tangerine-icon-theme Tangerine Icon theme tango-icon-theme Tango Icon theme Reason: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License 3 non-free packages, 0.2% of 1851 installed packages. timmy@freedom-zero:~$ sudo aptitude remove human-icon-theme tangerine-icon-theme tango-icon-theme --purge ;vrms [sudo] password for timmy: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initialising package states... Done Building tag database... Done The following packages are BROKEN: gobuntu-desktop human-theme tango-icon-theme-common The following packages will be REMOVED: human-icon-theme tangerine-icon-theme tango-icon-theme 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 18.1MB will be freed. The following packages have unmet dependencies: tango-icon-theme-common: Depends: tango-icon-theme but it is not installable human-theme: Depends: human-icon-theme but it is not installable gobuntu-desktop: Depends: tangerine-icon-theme but it is not installable Resolving dependencies... The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Remove the following packages: gobuntu-desktop human-theme tango-icon-theme-common ubuntu-artwork Score is 326 Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] #### From what I can see gobuntu-desktop meta-package depends on the non-free package tangerine-icon-theme. Would someone like to fix this? Tim P.S. having just looked at the list I see a post about gobuntu artwork. I imagine this ties in with that. -- www.blog.tdobson.net ---- If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us still has one object. If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now has two ideas. - George Bernard Shaw -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel |
hardy *depends* on non-free artwork?
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 19:44 +0000, Tim Dobson wrote:
> Hi there. > I know vrms is a guide not a definitive tool but would anyone like to > take a look at this: > > #### > > timmy@freedom-zero:~$ vrms > Non-free packages installed on freedom-zero > > human-icon-theme Human Icon theme > tangerine-icon-theme Tangerine Icon theme > tango-icon-theme Tango Icon theme > Reason: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License > > 3 non-free packages, 0.2% of 1851 installed packages. > <snip> > > #### > > From what I can see gobuntu-desktop meta-package depends on the > non-free package tangerine-icon-theme. AIUI, the FSF consider CC-SA 2.5 to be free, but because its part of the CC licences, wont support it. Search down to "Creative commons" near the bottom. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html Debian have issues with CC licences in general, and i belive none are DFSG free. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/01/msg00020.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/01/msg00021.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/01/msg00022.html kk > > Would someone like to fix this? > > Tim > > P.S. having just looked at the list I see a post about gobuntu artwork. > I imagine this ties in with that. > > -- Karl Goetz, Debian user / Ubuntu contributor / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel |
hardy *depends* on non-free artwork?
On 22/03/2008, Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> wrote:
> > AIUI, the FSF consider CC-SA 2.5 to be free, but because its part of the > CC licences, wont support it. > Debian have issues with CC licences in general, and i belive none are > DFSG free. Yes, that's right; the FSF considers CC-BY(-SA) free, and Debian don't (mainly because of the anti-DRM stuff, iirc) RMS used to not support CC because they promoted a load of licenses that didn't permit verbatim noncommercial sharing worldwide, but CC changed their policy and "discontinued" those licenses, so RMS now supports them. I assume the FSF follows his change. -- Regards, Dave -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel |
hardy *depends* on non-free artwork?
Karl Goetz wrote:
> AIUI, the FSF consider CC-SA 2.5 to be free, but because its part of the > CC licences, wont support it. Apologies. I'm sure exactly where this leaves me, but that doesn't really matter. it's interesting that the vrms maintainers have interpreted a non-fsf point of view, but this isn't the point, and it really doesn't matter to me whose POV they interpret. A few minutes after I posted the email I looked again at what the licence was, thought something looked strange and did the research. Yeah, so perhaps I should have looked a bit more carefully before posting. -- www.blog.tdobson.net ---- If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us still has one object. If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now has two ideas. - George Bernard Shaw -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel |
hardy *depends* on non-free artwork?
Dave Crossland wrote:
> RMS used to not support CC because they promoted a load of licenses > that didn't permit verbatim noncommercial sharing worldwide, but CC > changed their policy and "discontinued" those licenses, so RMS now > supports them. I assume the FSF follows his change. Well also Lessig is on the board of directors. I'm not sure why to be honest, but this might have soemthing to do with it. -- www.blog.tdobson.net ---- If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us still has one object. If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now has two ideas. - George Bernard Shaw -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel |
hardy *depends* on non-free artwork?
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Tim Dobson <personalwebsite@army.com> wrote:
Karl Goetz wrote: > AIUI, the FSF consider CC-SA 2.5 to be free, but because its part of the > CC licences, wont support it. Apologies. I'm sure exactly where this leaves me, but that doesn't really matter. it's interesting that the vrms maintainers have interpreted a non-fsf point of view, but this isn't the point, and it really doesn't matter to me whose POV they interpret. Vrms tends to have inaccuracies like this. It has been considered more than once to drop it from gNewSense due to the hassle it causes. And now back to your regularly scheduled Gobuntu discussions... Brian * A few minutes after I posted the email I looked again at what the licence was, thought something looked strange and did the research. Yeah, so perhaps I should have looked a bit more carefully before posting. -- www.blog.tdobson.net ---- If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us still has one object. If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now has two ideas. * - *George Bernard Shaw -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel -- Gobuntu-devel mailing list Gobuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/gobuntu-devel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.