I see, "good" tells nothing. I mean cases with most currently spreaded
HDDs on workstations. Say, with SAMSUNG HD401LJ I have ~3700 MB/sec and
~65 MB/sec. Is it "normal"/expected?
Andrew
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
04-11-2008, 04:55 PM
Dale
what 'hdparm -tT' is good for SATA HDD?
Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Hi!
I see, "good" tells nothing. I mean cases with most currently spreaded
HDDs on workstations. Say, with SAMSUNG HD401LJ I have ~3700 MB/sec and
~65 MB/sec. Is it "normal"/expected?
Andrew
I think for SATA needs this:
root@smoker / # eix sdparm
* sys-apps/sdparm
Available versions: 0.97 0.98 ~0.99 1.00 1.01 1.02
Homepage: http://sg.torque.net/sg/sdparm.html
Description: Utility to output and modify parameters on a
SCSI device, like hdparm
root@smoker / #
I could be wrong tho.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
04-11-2008, 05:00 PM
Andrew Gaydenko
what 'hdparm -tT' is good for SATA HDD?
======= On Friday 11 April 2008, Dale wrote: =======
> Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I see, "good" tells nothing. I mean cases with most currently
> > spreaded HDDs on workstations. Say, with SAMSUNG HD401LJ I have
> > ~3700 MB/sec and ~65 MB/sec. Is it "normal"/expected?
> >
> >
> > Andrew
>
> I think for SATA needs this:
>
> root@smoker / # eix sdparm
> * sys-apps/sdparm
> Available versions: 0.97 0.98 ~0.99 1.00 1.01 1.02
> Homepage: http://sg.torque.net/sg/sdparm.html
> Description: Utility to output and modify parameters on
> a SCSI device, like hdparm
>
> root@smoker / #
>
>
> I could be wrong tho.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
I'm sure, 'sdparm' is not intended to be used by "ordinary" users: you
need to know every atom of your hardware protocols to use the tool :-)
Andrew
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
04-11-2008, 07:46 PM
Volker Armin Hemmann
what 'hdparm -tT' is good for SATA HDD?
On Freitag, 11. April 2008, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I see, "good" tells nothing. I mean cases with most currently spreaded
> HDDs on workstations. Say, with SAMSUNG HD401LJ I have ~3700 MB/sec and
> ~65 MB/sec. Is it "normal"/expected?
yes, its in the normal range. The first result is even pretty high,
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list