bindmount or symlink?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Pandu Poluan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr,
> e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living somewhere else, on
> different partition and different filesystem. Let's say something mounted on
> My question: should I use bindmount or symlinks to do that? What's the
> drawbacks/benefits for either?
I'm sorry, I don't understand. What's the problem of having the
following in /etc/fstab?
LABEL=Portage /usr/portage ext4 noatime,auto 0 2
LABEL=Source /usr/source ext4 noatime,auto 0 2
(Replace LABEL=Portage with /dev/sda7, if you want to.)
Why do you need to bindmount or link the directories when you can
mount them wherever you want?
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México