FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Gentoo > Gentoo User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-02-2012, 09:23 AM
Pandu Poluan
 
Default "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues

Okay, after compiling hardened-sources-3.2.2-r1, I follow through with
remerging net-firewall/xtables-addons-1.39 ...

... and it failed with an error, about unknown symbol or something.

A Google search led me to this solution:

http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/8ef017a863038724?pli=1

Although the attached patch in that thread *seems* to be meant for
xtables-addons-1.40 (not in portage yet), I tried applying the patches
to xtables-addons-1.39 ...

... and it worked!

However, a quick glance at upstream [1] indicates that upstream is
already at version 1.41!!

So...

1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39?

2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree?


[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/


Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~

*• LOPSA Member #15248
*• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
*• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
 
Old 03-02-2012, 09:38 AM
Pandu Poluan
 
Default "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues

Silly me...

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:23, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>
> 1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39?
>
> 2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree?
>
>
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/
>
>

Upstream's 1.41 already incorporated the necessary fixes for
xtables-addons to be compilable on kernel 3.2/3.3:

http://xtables-addons.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=xtables-addons/xtables-addons;a=commitdiff;h=076610e3af86b4b3f87f9c7811d3 6e38ec8a39cd

So there's just one question: Why haven't the package maintainer pull
xtables-addons-1.41 into the portage tree?

Rgds
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~

*• LOPSA Member #15248
*• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
*• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
 
Old 03-02-2012, 09:42 AM
Pandu Poluan
 
Default "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:38, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> Silly me...
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:23, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>>
>> 1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39?
>>
>> 2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree?
>>
>>
>> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/
>>
>>
>
> Upstream's 1.41 already incorporated the necessary fixes for
> xtables-addons to be compilable on kernel 3.2/3.3:
>
> http://xtables-addons.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=xtables-addons/xtables-addons;a=commitdiff;h=076610e3af86b4b3f87f9c7811d3 6e38ec8a39cd
>
> So there's just one question: Why haven't the package maintainer pull
> xtables-addons-1.41 into the portage tree?
>

Bugs #397749, #403749, and #405197, apparently.


Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~

*• LOPSA Member #15248
*• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
*• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org