About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused
portage to lose the ability to work verbosely.
Ever since it looks like this:
<paste>
idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Starting parallel fetch
>>> Emerging (1 of 6) sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1
>>> Jobs: 0 of 6 complete, 1 running Load avg: 2.16, 1.66, 1.10
</paste>
Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge portage, etc etc etc etc
I just can't seem to get proper output from emerge anymore no matter what. Other than that
everything is working fine, but I do need to see actual output.
Anyone know what to do to fix this?
TIA!
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
12-03-2011, 01:29 PM
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
emerge ignoring -v switch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. If you want the old
behaviour back, you can add
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
to your make.conf
So long
Hinnerk
On 03.12.2011 15:23, Indi wrote:
> Howdy y'all,
>
> About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused
> portage to lose the ability to work verbosely. Ever since it looks
> like this: <paste> idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND
> adobe-flash
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ]
> sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1 [2.14.1] USE="nls -debug -gd -glibc-omitfp
> (-hardened) (-multilib) -profile (-selinux) -vanilla" 150 kB
> [ebuild R ] sys-devel/binutils-2.22 USE="nls zlib%*
> -multislot -multitarget -static-libs -test -vanilla" 0 kB [ebuild
> U ] dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0e-r1 [1.0.0e] USE="bindist kerberos sse2
> zlib -gmp -rfc3779 -static-libs% -test" 3,950 kB [ebuild U ]
> net-misc/curl-7.23.1 [7.22.0] USE="ipv6 ssl threads -ares -gnutls
> -idn -kerberos -ldap -nss -ssh% -static-libs -test (-libssh2%)"
> 2,321 kB [ebuild U ] dev-libs/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25 [2.1.23-r6]
> USE="berkdb openldap ssl -authdaemond -gdbm -java -kerberos
> -ldapdb% -mysql -pam -postgres -sample -sqlite% -srp -static-libs%
> -urandom (-crypt%*) (-ntlm_unsupported_patch%)" 5,088 kB [ebuild
> U ] dev-vcs/git-1.7.8 [1.7.8_rc4] USE="blksha1 cgi curl cvs iconv
> perl python subversion threads webdav -doc -emacs -gtk (-ppcsha1)
> -tk -xinetd" 3,941 kB
>
> Total: 6 packages (5 upgrades, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads:
> 15,448 kB
>
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>>> Verifying ebuild manifests Starting parallel fetch Emerging
>>>> (1 of 6) sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1 Jobs: 0 of 6 complete, 1
>>>> running Load avg: 2.16, 1.66, 1.10
>
> </paste>
>
> Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge
> portage, etc etc etc etc I just can't seem to get proper output
> from emerge anymore no matter what. Other than that everything is
> working fine, but I do need to see actual output.
>
> Anyone know what to do to fix this?
>
> TIA!
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:23:48AM -0500, Indi wrote:
> About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused
> portage to lose the ability to work verbosely.
> Ever since it looks like this:
> <paste>
> idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1 [2.14.1] USE="nls -debug -gd -glibc-omitfp (-hardened) (-multilib) -profile (-selinux) -vanilla" 150 kB
> [ebuild R ] sys-devel/binutils-2.22 USE="nls zlib%* -multislot -multitarget -static-libs -test -vanilla" 0 kB
> [ebuild U ] dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0e-r1 [1.0.0e] USE="bindist kerberos sse2 zlib -gmp -rfc3779 -static-libs% -test" 3,950 kB
> [ebuild U ] net-misc/curl-7.23.1 [7.22.0] USE="ipv6 ssl threads -ares -gnutls -idn -kerberos -ldap -nss -ssh% -static-libs -test (-libssh2%)" 2,321 kB
> [ebuild U ] dev-libs/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25 [2.1.23-r6] USE="berkdb openldap ssl -authdaemond -gdbm -java -kerberos -ldapdb% -mysql -pam -postgres -sample -sqlite% -srp -static-libs% -urandom (-crypt%*) (-ntlm_unsupported_patch%)" 5,088 kB
> [ebuild U ] dev-vcs/git-1.7.8 [1.7.8_rc4] USE="blksha1 cgi curl cvs iconv perl python subversion threads webdav -doc -emacs -gtk (-ppcsha1) -tk -xinetd" 3,941 kB
>
> Total: 6 packages (5 upgrades, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 15,448 kB
>
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
> >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> >>> Starting parallel fetch
> >>> Emerging (1 of 6) sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1
> >>> Jobs: 0 of 6 complete, 1 running Load avg: 2.16, 1.66, 1.10
>
> </paste>
>
> Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge portage, etc etc etc etc
> I just can't seem to get proper output from emerge anymore no matter what. Other than that
> everything is working fine, but I do need to see actual output.
>
> Anyone know what to do to fix this?
Did you enable parallel builds? I.e. added --jobs and/or --load related options
to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS? In that case emerge uses this kind of output, because
obviously you can’t display multiple builds at the same time in one window.
The -v flag, to my knowledge, only affects the output of -p and -a, adding
information like used and changed use flags and file size to download for each
package to be installed.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.
“We all know Linux is great … it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.”
– Linus Torvalds
12-04-2011, 07:27 AM
Mick
emerge ignoring -v switch
On Saturday 03 Dec 2011 16:45:19 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:23:48AM -0500, Indi wrote:
> > About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused
> > portage to lose the ability to work verbosely.
> > Ever since it looks like this:
> > <paste>
> > idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1 [2.14.1] USE="nls -debug -gd
> > -glibc-omitfp (-hardened) (-multilib) -profile (-selinux) -vanilla" 150
> > kB [ebuild R ] sys-devel/binutils-2.22 USE="nls zlib%* -multislot
> > -multitarget -static-libs -test -vanilla" 0 kB [ebuild U ]
> > dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0e-r1 [1.0.0e] USE="bindist kerberos sse2 zlib -gmp
> > -rfc3779 -static-libs% -test" 3,950 kB [ebuild U ]
> > net-misc/curl-7.23.1 [7.22.0] USE="ipv6 ssl threads -ares -gnutls -idn
> > -kerberos -ldap -nss -ssh% -static-libs -test (-libssh2%)" 2,321 kB
> > [ebuild U ] dev-libs/cyrus-sasl-2.1.25 [2.1.23-r6] USE="berkdb
> > openldap ssl -authdaemond -gdbm -java -kerberos -ldapdb% -mysql -pam
> > -postgres -sample -sqlite% -srp -static-libs% -urandom (-crypt%*)
> > (-ntlm_unsupported_patch%)" 5,088 kB [ebuild U ] dev-vcs/git-1.7.8
> > [1.7.8_rc4] USE="blksha1 cgi curl cvs iconv perl python subversion
> > threads webdav -doc -emacs -gtk (-ppcsha1) -tk -xinetd" 3,941 kB
> >
> > Total: 6 packages (5 upgrades, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 15,448 kB
> >
> > Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
> >
> > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> > >>> Starting parallel fetch
> > >>> Emerging (1 of 6) sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r1
> > >>> Jobs: 0 of 6 complete, 1 running Load avg: 2.16, 1.66,
> > >>> 1.10
> >
> > </paste>
> >
> > Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge portage,
> > etc etc etc etc I just can't seem to get proper output from emerge
> > anymore no matter what. Other than that everything is working fine, but
> > I do need to see actual output.
> >
> > Anyone know what to do to fix this?
>
> Did you enable parallel builds? I.e. added --jobs and/or --load related
> options to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS? In that case emerge uses this kind of
> output, because obviously you can’t display multiple builds at the same
> time in one window.
>
> The -v flag, to my knowledge, only affects the output of -p and -a, adding
> information like used and changed use flags and file size to download for
> each package to be installed.
I've got both -j and -l set in my MAKEOPTS and portage is quite verbose as it
has always been. I don't know if EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS has a different effect.
--
Regards,
Mick
12-04-2011, 01:05 PM
Frank Steinmetzger
emerge ignoring -v switch
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:27:33AM +0000, Mick wrote:
> > > Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge portage,
> > > etc etc etc etc I just can't seem to get proper output from emerge
> > > anymore no matter what. Other than that everything is working fine, but
> > > I do need to see actual output.
> > >
> > > Anyone know what to do to fix this?
> >
> > Did you enable parallel builds? I.e. added --jobs and/or --load related
> > options to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS? In that case emerge uses this kind of
> > output, because obviously you can’t display multiple builds at the same
> > time in one window.
> >
> > The -v flag, to my knowledge, only affects the output of -p and -a, adding
> > information like used and changed use flags and file size to download for
> > each package to be installed.
>
> I've got both -j and -l set in my MAKEOPTS and portage is quite verbose as it
> has always been. I don't know if EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS has a different effect.
Indeed it has. MAKE_OPTS contains options to make, whereas EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS
contains those for emerge. Both have a -j option. If you tell -j (jobs) to
emerge, it will do as many emerges simultaneously.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.
...still, there is life before death!
12-04-2011, 02:18 PM
Mick
emerge ignoring -v switch
On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 14:05:29 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:27:33AM +0000, Mick wrote:
> > > > Remerged python, verified the right python via eselect, remerge
> > > > portage, etc etc etc etc I just can't seem to get proper output from
> > > > emerge anymore no matter what. Other than that everything is working
> > > > fine, but I do need to see actual output.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone know what to do to fix this?
> > >
> > > Did you enable parallel builds? I.e. added --jobs and/or --load related
> > > options to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS? In that case emerge uses this kind of
> > > output, because obviously you can’t display multiple builds at the same
> > > time in one window.
> > >
> > > The -v flag, to my knowledge, only affects the output of -p and -a,
> > > adding information like used and changed use flags and file size to
> > > download for each package to be installed.
> >
> > I've got both -j and -l set in my MAKEOPTS and portage is quite verbose
> > as it has always been. I don't know if EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS has a
> > different effect.
>
> Indeed it has. MAKE_OPTS contains options to make, whereas
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS contains those for emerge. Both have a -j option. If
> you tell -j (jobs) to emerge, it will do as many emerges simultaneously.
Oh I see! Thanks for explaining this.
But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their output
printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult to untangle the
spaghetti that may show up in an error?
--
Regards,
Mick
12-04-2011, 07:49 PM
Neil Bothwick
emerge ignoring -v switch
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +0000, Mick wrote:
> But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their
> output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult
> to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error?
Which is why setting -j >1 sets wh
--
Neil Bothwick
I don't have any solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
at is now the quiet-build option, so you only get the progress
information from portage, not from gcc. If one of your ebuilds fails, the
gcc output is displayed at the end.
--
Neil Bothwick
I've got a mind like a... a... what's that thing called?
12-06-2011, 07:58 AM
Mick
emerge ignoring -v switch
On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 20:49:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +0000, Mick wrote:
> > But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all their
> > output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily difficult
> > to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error?
>
> Which is why setting -j >1 sets wh
Did you mean to finish this message later on, or does "wh" mean something? o_O
--
Regards,
Mick
12-07-2011, 08:14 AM
Neil Bothwick
emerge ignoring -v switch
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:58:23 +0000, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 20:49:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +0000, Mick wrote:
> > > But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all
> > > their output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily
> > > difficult to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error?
> >
> > Which is why setting -j >1 sets wh
>
> Did you mean to finish this message later on, or does "wh" mean
> something? o_O
Not only did I mean to finish it, I thought I had. Using --jobs >1 sets
the quiet-build flag, so you only get the emerge output, not all the
stuff from autotools and gcc. If an ebuild fails, you get that output at
the end.
--
Neil Bothwick
WinErr 012: Window closed - Do not look inside
12-07-2011, 09:26 AM
Nikos Chantziaras
emerge ignoring -v switch
On 12/07/2011 11:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:58:23 +0000, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 04 Dec 2011 20:49:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:18:40 +0000, Mick wrote:
But then if there were say 5 ebuilds running in parallel and all
their output printed in the same terminal, it would be almightily
difficult to untangle the spaghetti that may show up in an error?
Which is why setting -j>1 sets wh
Did you mean to finish this message later on, or does "wh" mean
something? o_O
Not only did I mean to finish it, I thought I had. Using --jobs>1 sets
the quiet-build flag
It also sets it if you don't use more than 1 job. As another poster
(Hinnerk) already mentioned, the only way to get the old behavior back
is to use the "--quiet-build=n" option.
emerge ignoring -v switch
