>> That's one of the reason why I wanted intelfb, but got no luck. I'm
>> using uvesafb at the moment, but still hope intelfb will be fixed
> I seem to have missed the start of this thread, but if you don't mind,
> could you give me a quick idea on what is broken within intelfb? I've
> been debating on switching to it, but keep seeing info on it being
> broken, and nothing on WHAT is broken.
I see screen with many scrolling white lines (probably this are kernel
messages). It looks like problem with synchronization or unsupported
uvesafb works nice.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
03-28-2008, 05:47 AM
Re intelfb and 945GM
> uvesafb works, but it is a bit slow, and requires user-space programs to
> run. Its a great peice of code and such, but something that is
> kernel-space and able to use hardware effectivly would be even nicer.