FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Gentoo > Gentoo User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 09-03-2011, 06:25 PM
 
Default /etc/modules, 2.6, and 3.0

Upgrading /etc/modules, I notice it has 2_6 for all its examples;
should this be changed to 3_0 if running a 3.0 kernel? I am going to
expand it with both, for the time being, but all the gentoo.org docs
still show 2_6, and it made me think, always a confusing misstep.

--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
 
Old 09-04-2011, 01:09 PM
Michael Orlitzky
 
Default /etc/modules, 2.6, and 3.0

On 09/03/2011 02:25 PM, felix@crowfix.com wrote:
> Upgrading /etc/modules, I notice it has 2_6 for all its examples;
> should this be changed to 3_0 if running a 3.0 kernel? I am going to
> expand it with both, for the time being, but all the gentoo.org docs
> still show 2_6, and it made me think, always a confusing misstep.
>

You can also drop the version number entirely, e.g.,

modules="${modules} powernow-k8"
module_powernow_k8_args=""

modules="${modules} r8169"
module_r8169_args=""

...
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org