Bugzilla search
 

I was searching Bugzilla for a bug namely #342845, which I found via
google
(http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-vcs/git/git-1.7.3.2-r1.ebuild?view=markup),
because when I put git-1.7.3.2-r1 in the Find field of Bugzilla
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/) it returns Zarro Boogs found. Is this normal?
Am I missing something in the way I should use the Bugzilla interface to
do a seach?

Bugzilla search
 

On Saturday 30 October 2010, Thanasis wrote:
> I was searching Bugzilla for a bug namely #342845, which I found via
> google
> (http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-vcs/git/
> git-1.7.3.2-r1.ebuild?view=markup), because when I put git-1.7.3.2-r1
> in the Find field of Bugzilla (http://bugs.gentoo.org/) it returns
> Zarro Boogs found. Is this normal? Am I missing something in the way
> I should use the Bugzilla interface to do a seach?

I guess you wrote '#342845', if you use '342845' it works:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342845

HTH
Francesco

--
Linux Version 2.6.35-gentoo-r11, Compiled #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 29
20:33:46 CEST 2010
Two 2.9GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processors, 4GB RAM, 11659 Bogomips Total
aemaeth

Bugzilla search
 

2010/10/30 Thanasis <thanasis@asyr.hopto.org>:
> I was searching Bugzilla for a bug namely #342845, which I found via
> google
> (http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-vcs/git/git-1.7.3.2-r1.ebuild?view=markup),
> because when I put git-1.7.3.2-r1 in the Find field of Bugzilla
> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/) it returns Zarro Boogs found. Is this normal?
> Am I missing something in the way I should use the Bugzilla interface to
> do a seach?
>
>

Default is to search within unconfirmed, new, assigned and reopened
bugs where as #342845 is resolved.

Either 'edit search' and 'ctrl+left click' 'resolved' to include it
from 'status' list or just simply type bugs -> hit End key ((assuming
your browaser's omnibox will autocompletes it to bugs.gentoo.org) ->
slash -> paste the bug number -> bugs.gentoo.org/342845.

Searching for bug number should also redirect to the bug page.

--
Fatih

Bugzilla search
 

On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 10:13 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> git-1.7.3.2-r1

prefix it with ALL, ie search for "ALL git-1.7.3.2-r1". Because the bug
is resolved it won't appear in basic searches. alternatively you could
do an advanced search and select the statuses that you were interested
in.
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>

If it ain't baroque, don't phiques it.

Bugzilla search
 

on 10/30/2010 10:55 AM Iain Buchanan wrote the following:
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 10:13 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
>> git-1.7.3.2-r1
> prefix it with ALL, ie search for "ALL git-1.7.3.2-r1". Because the bug
> is resolved it won't appear in basic searches. alternatively you could
> do an advanced search and select the statuses that you were interested
> in.
That did it. Thanks !

Bugzilla search
 

on 10/30/2010 10:49 AM Fatih Tümen wrote the following:
> 2010/10/30 Thanasis <thanasis@asyr.hopto.org>:
>> I was searching Bugzilla for a bug namely #342845, which I found via
>> google
>> (http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-vcs/git/git-1.7.3.2-r1.ebuild?view=markup),
>> because when I put git-1.7.3.2-r1 in the Find field of Bugzilla
>> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/) it returns Zarro Boogs found. Is this normal?
>> Am I missing something in the way I should use the Bugzilla interface to
>> do a seach?
>>
>>
> Default is to search within unconfirmed, new, assigned and reopened
> bugs where as #342845 is resolved.
>
> Either 'edit search' and 'ctrl+left click' 'resolved' to include it
> from 'status' list or just simply type bugs -> hit End key ((assuming
> your browaser's omnibox will autocompletes it to bugs.gentoo.org) ->
> slash -> paste the bug number -> bugs.gentoo.org/342845.
>
> Searching for bug number should also redirect to the bug page.
>
> --
> Fatih
I wasn't searching by bug number.
Thank you for the search tips!