FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Gentoo > Gentoo User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-28-2010, 02:14 PM
Mick
 
Default lm_sensors patch borked?

The emerge of sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1 fails as follows:
=================================================
# emerge -uDv world

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1 [3.1.2] USE="-sensord" 0 kB

Total: 1 package (1 upgrade), Size of downloads: 0 kB


>>> Verifying ebuild manifests

>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1
* lm_sensors-3.1.2.tar.bz2 RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ... [ ok ]
* checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
* checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
* checking miscfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
* CPV: sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1
* REPO: gentoo
* USE: amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib userland_GNU
* Determining the location of the kernel source code
* Found kernel source directory:
* /usr/src/linux
* Found kernel object directory:
* /lib/modules/2.6.33-gentoo-r2/build
* Found sources for kernel version:
* 2.6.33-gentoo-r2
* Checking for suitable kernel configuration options... [ ok ]
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking lm_sensors-3.1.2.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1/work
>>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1/work
>>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors-3.1.2-r1/work/lm_sensors-3.1.2 ...
* Applying lm_sensors-3.1.2-sensors-detect-gentoo.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch ...

* Failed Patch: lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch !
* ( /usr/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch
)
=================================================

This is what the patch.out file says:

***** lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch *****

==================================================

PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch <
'/usr/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch'

==================================================
patching file prog/sensord/rrd.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 138.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 150.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 161.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 187.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 200.
5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file prog/sensord/rrd.c.rej
==================================================

PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch <
'/usr/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch'

==================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 6
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/325083
|http://www.lm-sensors.org/changeset/5835
|
|--- prog/sensord/rrd.c
|+++ prog/sensord/rrd.c
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
***** lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch *****

==================================================

PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/sys-ap
ps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch'

==================================================
patching file prog/sensord/rrd.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 138.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 150.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 161.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 187.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 200.
5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file prog/sensord/rrd.c.rej
==================================================

PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/sys-ap
ps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch'

==================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 6
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/325083
|http://www.lm-sensors.org/changeset/5835
|
|--- prog/sensord/rrd.c
|+++ prog/sensord/rrd.c
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
==================================================

PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/sys-ap
ps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch'

==================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 6
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|http://bugs.gentoo.org/325083
|http://www.lm-sensors.org/changeset/5835
|
|--- prog/sensord/rrd.c
|+++ prog/sensord/rrd.c
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
==================================================

Shall I delete the patch from
/usr/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors/files/lm_sensors-3.1.2-changeset_r5835.patch
and resync?
--
Regards,
Mick
 
Old 06-28-2010, 02:40 PM
justin
 
Default lm_sensors patch borked?

The patch was borked. Either bump to latest sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 or
resync later. It is fixed now.
 
Old 06-28-2010, 04:12 PM
Mick
 
Default lm_sensors patch borked?

On 28 June 2010 15:40, justin <justin@j-schmitz.net> wrote:
> The patch was borked. Either bump to latest sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 or
> resync later. It is fixed now.


Thanks, will have another go.

--
Regards,
Mick
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org