Hi list,

pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?

X

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188

[2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit
--
Xianwen Chen, M.Sc.
Scientific assistant, BFE, UiT (www.uit.no)
Tel.: +47 776 46 112 | Fax: +47 776 46 020

On Friday 14 May 2010 15:47:54 Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>
> X
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188

Did you read this bug at all? The answer is in it.

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158188#c25

--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14/05/10 15:47, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>
> X
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188
>
> [2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit

It seems to be a qt3 app and as there is no support for qt3 anymore, is
was removed.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvtXZMACgkQgAnW8HDreRZS9gCdEoKV9bqznX mrkk706jXuPi+M
0IAAnjwzz/JeLa8L7MXO3N1XlHosONXn
=bTw0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On 14 May 2010 14:47, Xianwen Chen <xianwen.chen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>
> X
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188
>
> [2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit

I don't know for sure, but has pdfedit been ported into Qt4 yet?
--
Regards,
Mick

Looked at the overlays. Following overlays list contain some of the
matching ebuilds:

http://www.ebuildfind.net/search/?q=pdfedit

Thanks

Ubiquitous1990

On 14/05/10 21:47, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>
> X
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188
>
> [2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit
>

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Xianwen Chen <xianwen.chen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>
> X
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188
>
> [2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit

According to http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158188#c25

"Closing as wont be fixed since we dont add qt3 apps any more"

According to the pdfedit website, porting to Qt4 is ongoing but not
completed yet. So I guess you need to use the ebuilds from the bug
report, or wait for a Qt4 version of pdfedit to be released.

Thanks a lot!

Xianwen

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:06 PM, ubiquitous1980 <nixuser1980@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looked at the overlays. *Following overlays list contain some of the
> matching ebuilds:
>
> http://www.ebuildfind.net/search/?q=pdfedit
>
> Thanks
>
> Ubiquitous1990
>
> On 14/05/10 21:47, Xianwen Chen wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>>
>> X
>>
>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188
>>
>> [2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit
>>
>
>
>



--
Xianwen Chen, M.Sc.
Scientific assistant, BFE, UiT (www.bfe.uit.no)
Tel.: +47 776 46 112 | Fax: +47 776 46 020

I see. Thanks a lot!

X

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Paul Hartman
<paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Xianwen Chen <xianwen.chen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> pdfedit was in the portage tree [1], but not anymore[2]. Why is that?
>>
>> X
>>
>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/158188
>>
>> [2] http://gentoo-portage.com/Search?search=pdfedit
>
> According to http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158188#c25
>
> "Closing as wont be fixed since we dont add qt3 apps any more"
>
> According to the pdfedit website, porting to Qt4 is ongoing but not
> completed yet. So I guess you need to use the ebuilds from the bug
> report, or wait for a Qt4 version of pdfedit to be released.
>
>



--
Xianwen Chen, M.Sc.
Scientific assistant, BFE, UiT (www.bfe.uit.no)
Tel.: +47 776 46 112 | Fax: +47 776 46 020