no libdri.so with ati-drivers-10.1
I tried 10.1 but just got a blank screen. The log file shows that xorg
couldnt load libdri.so, and the file is missing under /usr/lib64/xorg. (its at /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so in 9.9-r2) So, any ideas or should i issue a bug report? |
no libdri.so with ati-drivers-10.1
=== On Sat, 02/20, Adam wrote: ===
> So, any ideas or should i issue a bug report? === Yes, use the open source drivers: x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati ;-) -- Keith Dart -- -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Keith Dart <keith@dartworks.biz> public key: ID: 19017044 <http://www.dartworks.biz/> ================================================== =================== |
no libdri.so with ati-drivers-10.1
On Samstag 20 Februar 2010, Adam wrote:
> I tried 10.1 but just got a blank screen. The log file shows that xorg > couldnt load libdri.so, and the file is missing under /usr/lib64/xorg. > (its at /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so in 9.9-r2) > > So, any ideas or should i issue a bug report? afaik that file is not needed anymore. |
no libdri.so with ati-drivers-10.1
On 02/20/10 04:03, Keith Dart wrote:
> === On Sat, 02/20, Adam wrote: === > >> So, any ideas or should i issue a bug report? >> > === > > Yes, use the open source drivers: > > x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati > This can't universally be the answer. I have been forced to upgrade from ati-drivers-9.11 (due to being stuck at xorg-server-1.6.5) to xf86-video-ati-6.12.4, however I have yet to find a successful xorg.conf configuration that will give me *dual-screen*, (not single screen, dual monitor), setup that I had working with flgrx. I would really like to stay with the opensource radeonhd driver, but it looks like I have to give up dual-screen (:0.0, :0.1 setup) which I prefer for Gnome. So it would nice to still have a working ati-drivers setup until xf86-video-ati does it all. Anthony |
no libdri.so with ati-drivers-10.1
Am Montag 22 Februar 2010 16:17:06 schrieb Anthony Mutiso:
> I would really like to stay with the opensource radeonhd driver, but it > looks like I have to give up dual-screen (:0.0, :0.1 setup) which I > prefer for Gnome. > > So it would nice to still have a working ati-drivers setup until > xf86-video-ati does it all. Much luck for that. I had spent a lot of time to get that working and now I use Xrandr ;-) xf86-video-ati has better support for that then radeonhd but with both is always the risk that it stops working after an update. Oh and dual-head (first and foremost with open drivers) is broken with xorg- server bigger 1.4 and smaller 1.7 Xrandr is no the new black and with that support for dual-screen layout is not much supported and very low priorised. There was/is a discussion running on the x11-mailinglist over that topic. The core content from that is "bury the old style, prefer xrandr, let the WM or DE handle the rest." Xrandr isn't that bad but its not mature enough. There is much to do on protocol side and on WM/DE side. Greetings |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.