Hi all,

The attached patch filters a number of new pychecker false positives.

Regards,

Hans
diff --git a/pychecker-false-positives b/pychecker-false-positives
index d756766..d6b6022 100644
--- a/pychecker-false-positives
+++ b/pychecker-false-positives
@@ -16,10 +16,16 @@ setattr
^network.py:[0-9]*: Object (.*props) has no attribute (Get)$
^partedUtils.py:[0-9]*: No module attribute (__dict__) found$
^partedUtils.py:[0-9]*: No module attribute (DEVICE_SX8) found$
+^partedUtils.py:[0-9]*: Object (productUpgrades) has no attribute (has_key)$
^kickstart.py:[0-9]*: No global (fileSystemTypeGet.*) found$
+^kickstart.py:[0-9]*: Object (kwargs) has no attribute (update)$
^upgrade.py:[0-9]*: No global (getUsableLinuxFs) found$
^upgrade.py:[0-9]*: No global (SwapFileDevice) found$
^upgrade.py:[0-9]*: No global (fileSystemTypeGet) found$
^upgrade.py:[0-9]*: No global (FileSystemSetEntry) found$
^upgrade.py:[0-9]*: No global (readFstab) found$
+^iutil.py:[0-9]*: Object (ppcType) has no attribute (items)$
+^livecd.py:[0-9]*: Object (fsdict) has no attribute (keys)$
+^packages.py:[0-9]*: Object (publicBetas) has no attribute (items)$
+^partRequests.py:[0-9]*: Format string argument count (0) doesn't match arguments (1)$
Note this last line must never end with a newline
No newline at end of file
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

On Monday, February 02 2009, Hans de Goede said:
> The attached patch filters a number of new pychecker false positives.

While this looks okay, it also seems like it's a generic bug in
pychecker that should be fixed rather than having us working around with
adding more and more of our dicts to the whitelist

Jeremy

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list