Linux Archive

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)
-   Gentoo Portage Developer (http://www.linux-archive.org/gentoo-portage-developer/)
-   -   proj/portage:master commit in: pym/repoman/, pym/portage/tests/repoman/ (http://www.linux-archive.org/gentoo-portage-developer/589692-proj-portage-master-commit-pym-repoman-pym-portage-tests-repoman.html)

Zac Medico 10-21-2011 07:30 AM

proj/portage:master commit in: pym/repoman/, pym/portage/tests/repoman/
 
On 10/21/2011 12:09 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 21-10-2011 06:09:57 +0000, Zac Medico wrote:
>> UpdateChangeLog: split out/test copyright regex
>>
>> This also fixes a case where something like "Copyright 2011 " would be
>> replaced with "Copyright 2011-2011 ".
>
> I like this, but it should only happen when one would live in 1999
> (that's why I added it unconditionally), see below. I'm affraid we need
> the 1999 to be configured, for legal reasons (though I don't claim to be
> an expert on this case, just judging from the comments from echangelog).

I don't see anything like that in echangelog. What would be the point of
re-writing copyright start dates, when those should already be correctly
inherited from skel.ChangeLog anyway?
--
Thanks,
Zac

Fabian Groffen 10-21-2011 08:35 AM

proj/portage:master commit in: pym/repoman/, pym/portage/tests/repoman/
 
On 21-10-2011 00:30:05 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 12:09 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 21-10-2011 06:09:57 +0000, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> UpdateChangeLog: split out/test copyright regex
> >>
> >> This also fixes a case where something like "Copyright 2011 " would be
> >> replaced with "Copyright 2011-2011 ".
> >
> > I like this, but it should only happen when one would live in 1999
> > (that's why I added it unconditionally), see below. I'm affraid we need
> > the 1999 to be configured, for legal reasons (though I don't claim to be
> > an expert on this case, just judging from the comments from echangelog).
>
> I don't see anything like that in echangelog. What would be the point of
> re-writing copyright start dates, when those should already be correctly
> inherited from skel.ChangeLog anyway?

Sure, but this is mainly intended for ebuilds and files (like init
scripts?), I guess. I considered using skel.ebuild for .ebuild files,
perhaps that's just the best to avoid hardcoding any years.


--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

Zac Medico 10-21-2011 05:40 PM

proj/portage:master commit in: pym/repoman/, pym/portage/tests/repoman/
 
On 10/21/2011 01:35 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 21-10-2011 00:30:05 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 10/21/2011 12:09 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 21-10-2011 06:09:57 +0000, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>> UpdateChangeLog: split out/test copyright regex
>>>>
>>>> This also fixes a case where something like "Copyright 2011 " would be
>>>> replaced with "Copyright 2011-2011 ".
>>>
>>> I like this, but it should only happen when one would live in 1999
>>> (that's why I added it unconditionally), see below. I'm affraid we need
>>> the 1999 to be configured, for legal reasons (though I don't claim to be
>>> an expert on this case, just judging from the comments from echangelog).
>>
>> I don't see anything like that in echangelog. What would be the point of
>> re-writing copyright start dates, when those should already be correctly
>> inherited from skel.ChangeLog anyway?
>
> Sure, but this is mainly intended for ebuilds and files (like init
> scripts?), I guess. I considered using skel.ebuild for .ebuild files,
> perhaps that's just the best to avoid hardcoding any years.

Well, repoman only creates ChangeLog files, not ebuilds or other files.
So, how is skel.ebuild relevant? Shouldn't repoman assume that the
existing copyright start date is correct in ebuilds and other files?
--
Thanks,
Zac


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.