On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@oversi.com> wrote:


amit0 ~ # qfile -v $(which equery)

app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.4.5 (/usr/bin/equery)
The newest version of gentoolkit has slightly changed the way depgraph prints output. Could you try checking with the latest unstable version of gentoolkit and submit a bug if you get the same results?



Thanks,
-Doug

P.S. Replying below the quote is the convention on most mailing lists. It's more readable if everyone does it... thanks

Douglas Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@oversi.com
<mailto:amitds@oversi.com>> wrote:


amit0 ~ # qfile -v $(which equery)
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.4.5 (/usr/bin/equery)


The newest version of gentoolkit has slightly changed the way depgraph
prints output. Could you try checking with the latest unstable version
of gentoolkit and submit a bug if you get the same results?



No change w/0.3.0_rc7:


amit0 ~ # qfile -v $(which equery)
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.3.0_rc7 (/usr/bin/equery)
amit0 ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
test/test-secondary-dep
amit0 ~ # equery -q depgraph --depth=1 test-depgraph
test/test-depgraph-1.0:
`-- test/test-depgraph-1.0
`-- test/test-primary-dep-1.0
`-- test/test-secondary-dep (unable to resolve: package masked or removed)
amit0 ~ # sed -i '1 s/^/#/' /etc/portage/package.mask
amit0 ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
#test/test-secondary-dep
amit0 ~ # equery -q depgraph --depth=1 test-depgraph
test/test-depgraph-1.0:
`-- test/test-depgraph-1.0
`-- test/test-primary-dep-1.0

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@oversi.com> wrote:






Douglas Anderson wrote:


The newest version of gentoolkit has slightly changed the way depgraph prints output. Could you try checking with the latest unstable version of gentoolkit and submit a bug if you get the same results?




No change w/0.3.0_rc7:
rc8(-r1) is newest in tree and depgraph is slightly changed in it. Same deal, please test with your setup and let me know. I'll have time this weekend to take a closer look.


Appreciate the testing!-Doug

Douglas Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@oversi.com
<mailto:amitds@oversi.com>> wrote:




Douglas Anderson wrote:


The newest version of gentoolkit has slightly changed the way
depgraph prints output. Could you try checking with the latest
unstable version of gentoolkit and submit a bug if you get the
same results?

No change w/0.3.0_rc7:


rc8(-r1) is newest in tree and depgraph is slightly changed in it.
Same deal, please test with your setup and let me know. I'll have time
this weekend to take a closer look.


Appreciate the testing!
-Doug

Ok! rc8-r1 works fine:

cm.stargate ~ # qfile -v $(which equery)
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.3.0_rc8-r1 (/usr/bin/equery)
cm.stargate ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
test/test-secondary-dep
cm.stargate ~ # equery -q depgraph --depth=1 test-depgraph
test/test-depgraph-1.0:
[ 0] test/test-depgraph-1.0
[ 0] test/test-primary-dep-1.0
cm.stargate ~ # rm /etc/portage/package.mask
cm.stargate ~ # equery -q depgraph --depth=2 test-depgraph
test/test-depgraph-1.0:
[ 0] test/test-depgraph-1.0
[ 0] test/test-primary-dep-1.0
[ 1] test/test-secondary-dep-1.0

Have a good weekend
Amit