Can anything be done about this bug(that is originally 2 years old)? Since the patch no longer works, and I can not install glibc-2.13-r2 because of it's own problems, I can not create a Luks partition that I need to create.





----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony G. Basile <basile@opensource.dyc.edu>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt

On 07/22/2011 02:07 PM, d hee wrote:
> No, Bug #283274 is about segmentation fault when encrypting a Luks partition :

Please look at the following links:

* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283274

* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283470



--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197

On 7/23/2011 4:54 PM, d hee wrote:

Can anything be done about this bug(that is originally 2 years old)? Since the patch no longer works, and I can not install glibc-2.13-r2 because of it's own problems, I can not create a Luks partition that I need to create.


You did the right thing by posting an update to the bug
tracker, but you missed a step from the error message:


* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
*
/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.1.3-r3/temp/newpatch.patch.out


The patch is failing because the source is too different
from what it's expecting; someone just needs to re-roll the
patch. Posting the output of that file into the bug report
may improve the chances of that happening quickly.


--Mike

lördag 23 juli 2011 13.54.47 skrev d hee:
> Can anything be done about this bug(that is originally 2 years old)? Since
> the patch no longer works, and I can not install glibc-2.13-r2 because of
> it's own problems, I can not create a Luks partition that I need to create.
Make a dir /etc/portage/patches/sys-libs/glibc
Put the last patch from the bug in there and then recompile glibc.
Works fine for me.
* Done with patching
* Applying user patches from /etc/portage/patches/sys-libs/glibc ...
* __restore_rt_attribute_hidden.patch ... [ ok ]
* Done with patching


/Magnus (Zorry)

I'm currently not able to recompile glibc. I tried and I keep getting a force unwind config error(this is a multi lib system). This is a pretty new system built about a month and a half ago. I checked with gcc-config and I am using the latest non masked compiler available from portage.



----- Original Message -----
From: Magnus Granberg <zorry@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt

lördag 23 juli 2011 13.54.47 skrev* d hee:
> Can anything be done about this bug(that is originally 2 years old)? Since
> the patch no longer works, and I can not install glibc-2.13-r2 because of
> it's own problems, I can not create a Luks partition that I need to create.
Make a dir /etc/portage/patches/sys-libs/glibc
Put the last patch from the bug in there and then recompile glibc.
Works fine for me.
* Done with patching
* Applying user patches from /etc/portage/patches/sys-libs/glibc ...
** __restore_rt_attribute_hidden.patch ...* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * [ ok ]
* Done with patching


/Magnus (Zorry)

Opened bug #376431 with necessary system information attached.



----- Original Message -----
From: d hee <coolio@ymail.com>
To: "gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt

I'm currently not able to recompile glibc. I tried and I keep getting a force unwind config error(this is a multi lib system). This is a pretty new system built about a month and a half ago. I checked with gcc-config and I am using the latest non masked compiler available from portage.



----- Original Message -----
From: Magnus Granberg <zorry@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt

lördag 23 juli 2011 13.54.47 skrev* d hee:
> Can anything be done about this bug(that is originally 2 years old)? Since
> the patch no longer works, and I can not install glibc-2.13-r2 because of
> it's own problems, I can not create a Luks partition that I need to create.
Make a dir /etc/portage/patches/sys-libs/glibc
Put the last patch from the bug in there and then recompile glibc.
Works fine for me.
* Done with patching
* Applying user patches from /etc/portage/patches/sys-libs/glibc ...
*** __restore_rt_attribute_hidden.patch ...* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** [ ok ]
* Done with patching


/Magnus (Zorry)

Ok, I attached all the information...including the patch output.


I'm not sure why, but I might of gotten the bug number wrong or there was some kind of mix up with the bug numbers but it is bug #283470.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: d hee <coolio@ymail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt

On 7/23/2011 4:54 PM, d hee wrote:
> Can anything be done about this bug(that is originally 2 years old)? Since the patch no longer works, and I can not install glibc-2.13-r2 because of it's own problems, I can not create a Luks partition that I need to create.

You did the right thing by posting an update to the bug tracker, but you missed a step from the error message:

* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.1.3-r3/temp/newpatch.patch.out

The patch is failing because the source is too different from what it's expecting; someone just needs to re-roll the patch. Posting the output of that file into the bug report may improve the chances of that happening quickly.

--Mike

*https://bugs.gentoo.org/376485 "Selinux policycoreutils-2.0.82 fails to compile because of python"

Added




----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony G. Basile <basile@opensource.dyc.edu>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/21/2011 06:06 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The SELinux bugs are "piling" up but most of them are resolved and I'd like to
> use the STATUS field to keep track of which bugs are actually still open...
>
> Considering the available states in the status field in bugzilla, I think it
> is a nice idea to say:
>
>* UNCONFIRMED = reported, not taken up
>* CONFIRMED* = reported and considered valid
>* IN_PROGRESS = taken up by a developer, fix might be available (ask developer)
>* RESOLVED* * = fix available, waiting QA. Fix might be in hardened-dev.git
>* * * * * * * * or another overlay
>* VERIFIED* * = fix available and accepted. Fix might be in ~arch
>* FIXED* * * = fix available and in portage tree "arch" status
>
> I know it looks like some bureaucratic nonesense for some, but at least that
> allows poor developers like me to see which bugs are still open for grabs,
> which are awaiting stabilization, which still needs to be pushed to portage
> tree, etc.
>
> Considering the above (but also recent updates and fixes), the following
> bugs need to be altered. Perhaps someone can take care of this for me?
>
> #283274 - Mark as FIXED
> #134129 - Mark as WONTFIX (we do not support SELinux and PPC)
> #274239 - Mark as FIXED
> #306393 - Mark as VERIFIED
> #257111 - Mark as VERIFIED
> #275085 - Mark as RESOLVED
> #211374 - Mark as IN_PROGRESS
> #368795 - Mark as RESOLVED
> #365761 - Mark as CONFIRMED
> #370765 - Mark as RESOLVED NEEDINFO + comment that the bug needs to be reopened then
> #371831 - Mark as RESOLVED
> #369089 - Mark as VERIFIED
> #371425 - Mark as VERIFIED
> #374991 - Mark as FIXED
> #375475 - Mark as CONFIRMED
> #375617 - Mark as IN_PROGRESS
> #373381 - Mark as CONFIRMED
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Wkr,
> *** Sven Vermeulen

I'll get them.



- --
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEAREIAAYFAk4pUvcACgkQl5yvQNBFVTUjUwCff769Pq00bD YBgmWSqhnLxFVN
POEAnj1UsjVzPS4k61W+IVElkK1L8k/0
=J3Sv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----