On Tuesday, September 14, 2010 19:44:20 Peter Stuge wrote:
> wireless wrote:
> > > There haven't been any more upstream releases, although there is
> > > definately upstream activity. I guess a git ebuild would be nice..
> > http://openocd.berlios.de/web/?m=201002
> > this shows version 0.4.0:
> > OpenOCD v0.4.0 released Monday, February 22nd, 2010
> > ARM looks to be the most active platform for openocd
> > portage has version ~0.3.1
> Oh sorry! I forgot that not even 0.4.0 is in portage. : But I do
> suggest a git version. Upstream development is pretty stable.
i guess someone should step up to be a maintainer for openocd. i have no
personal interest in it as we use urjtag at my job, so that's what i watch
over (up and down stream).