New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
Hiya,
there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an
eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the
portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them.
Suggestion: new category office-ext
What do you think?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
05-05-2012, 07:01 PM
Michael Orlitzky
New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an
> eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the
> portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them.
>
> Suggestion: new category office-ext
>
> What do you think?
No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache
which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and
apache under www-bar.
That would suggest app-libreoffice?
05-05-2012, 07:04 PM
Michał Górny
New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the
> help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some
> of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put
> them.
>
> Suggestion: new category office-ext
>
> What do you think?
office-plugins, to follow suit.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
05-05-2012, 07:14 PM
Krzysztof Pawlik
New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
On 05/05/12 21:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an
>> eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the
>> portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them.
>>
>> Suggestion: new category office-ext
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache
> which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and
> apache under www-bar.
>
> That would suggest app-libreoffice?
+1 on app-libreoffice if they are only for LibreOffice. Can those extensions
work with app-office/openoffice-bin?
--
Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xF6A80E46
desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache...
05-05-2012, 09:15 PM
Markos Chandras
New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
> <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with
>> the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to
>> get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide
>> where to put them.
>>
>> Suggestion: new category office-ext
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> office-plugins, to follow suit.
>
This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work
with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for
libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have
already suggested
New category for (libre)office extensions: office-ext ?
