glibc-2.14 for stable
there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything
that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). -mike |
glibc-2.14 for stable
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything > that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and > mark it a blocker of 370409). > -mike I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 -- Agostino Sarubbo ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D |
glibc-2.14 for stable
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:44:05 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything > > that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and > > mark it a blocker of 370409). > > I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. -mike |
glibc-2.14 for stable
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:51:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed > in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. I mean, no need to open a new bug, just continue in that security bug, because the fixed version has never had stable keyword. -- Agostino Sarubbo ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.