FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Gentoo > Gentoo Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-26-2012, 05:08 PM
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

If you wonder why I stopped filing new stabilization request, the
pybugz-based script that was filing those bugs started failing.

I have added some debugging statements to see what's going on, and
here's what https://bugs.gentoo.org says as a response to pybugz's
request to create a new bug:

<div class="throw_error">
It looks like you didn't come from the right page (you have no valid
token for
the <em>create_bug</em> action while processing the
'post_bug.cgi' script). The reason could be one of:<br>
<ul>
<li>You clicked the "Back" button of your web browser after having
successfully
submitted changes, which is generally not a good idea (but
harmless).</li>
<li>You entered the URL in the address bar of your web browser
directly,
which should be safe.</li>
<li>You clicked on a URL which redirected you here <b>without your
consent</b>,
in which case this action is much more critical.</li>
</ul>
Are you sure you want to commit these changes anyway? This may result in
unexpected and undesired results.
</div>

And there is a form below etc. etc. Note that only filing new bugs is
affected (updating existing ones works fine).

It's possible to repro with the command-line bugz tool (bugz ... post).

I'm using pybugz-0.9.3 and I'm connecting to https://bugs.gentoo.org

I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).

Any ideas?
 
Old 03-26-2012, 05:20 PM
Mike Gilbert
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>
> Any ideas?
>

I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.

I think you should file a bug for pybugz.

Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
 
Old 03-26-2012, 06:44 PM
Alec Warner
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>
> I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.
>
> I think you should file a bug for pybugz.
>
> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>

XML-RPC is shit.

[eom]

-A
 
Old 03-27-2012, 07:33 AM
Dirkjan Ochtman
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
>> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>
> XML-RPC is shit.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
 
Old 03-27-2012, 08:04 AM
Ian Whyman
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
>>> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>>
>> XML-RPC is shit.
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
>

Shame that it requires custom patches to BZ, personally I think the
preferable (and offically supported) method would be JSON-RPC[1]

Ian

1.http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.0/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.html
 
Old 03-27-2012, 01:52 PM
Ian Stakenvicius
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 27/03/12 04:04 AM, Ian Whyman wrote:
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use
>>>> Bugzilla's XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>>>
>>> XML-RPC is shit.
>>
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
>>
>
> Shame that it requires custom patches to BZ, personally I think
> the preferable (and offically supported) method would be
> JSON-RPC[1]
>
> Ian
>
> 1.http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.0/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.html
>
>
What about all of the above? Shouldn't be hard to use the various
support libs to dump the request object to either format, right?

(no, i'm not volunteering)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk9xxhoACgkQAJxUfCtlWe0nVwEA6DIm5IcHax ZuFUZz7ETOq8o3
zzVOBJqP84SY+FQv8xkBALlNtfKSgQLPR0Qoyc3/nUqt8hAuvOF0jOIEx9r0FVMm
=wYwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Old 03-27-2012, 02:45 PM
Mike Gilbert
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Ian Whyman <thev00d00@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
>>>> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>>>
>>> XML-RPC is shit.
>>
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
>>
>
> Shame that it requires custom patches to BZ, personally I think the
> preferable (and offically supported) method would be JSON-RPC[1]
>
> Ian
>
> 1.http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.0/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.html
>

Quoting that page:

Please note that everything about this JSON-RPC interface is
EXPERIMENTAL. If you want a fully stable API, please use the
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::XMLRPC|XML-RPC interface.

This is why I suggested the XML-RPC api.
 
Old 03-27-2012, 03:19 PM
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
> I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.
>
> I think you should file a bug for pybugz.

Right, and indeed I've found existing
<https://github.com/williamh/pybugz/pull/19> (there is patch inside).

William, this is now broken with Gentoo bugzilla. Could you please take
another look at the pull request referenced above.

Thanks.
 
Old 03-27-2012, 08:03 PM
William Hubbs
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> > <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
> >> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >>
> > I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.
> >
> > I think you should file a bug for pybugz.
>
> Right, and indeed I've found existing
> <https://github.com/williamh/pybugz/pull/19> (there is patch inside).

That is now merged into pybugz-9999, but it had nothing to do with the
bugzilla 4.2 issues.

I will see what else I can come up with, but patches/suggestions are
welcome.

William
 
Old 03-30-2012, 02:37 AM
Alec Warner
 
Default automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
>> > <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> >> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> >> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas?
>> >>
>> > I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.
>> >
>> > I think you should file a bug for pybugz.
>>
>> Right, and indeed I've found existing
>> <https://github.com/williamh/pybugz/pull/19> (there is patch inside).
>
> That is now merged into pybugz-9999, but it had nothing to do with the
> bugzilla 4.2 issues.
>
> I will see what else I can come up with, but patches/suggestions are
> welcome.
>
> William
>

My plan is to add support for the jsonrpc api, which I was going to do
this weekend.

-A
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org